| 
												
												Verse 1Ruth 4:1. Then went Boaz up to 
												the gate — Where the elders sat. 
												The Chaldee interprets it, “He 
												went up to the gate of the house 
												of judgment, where the Sanhedrim 
												sat.” Behold, the kinsman came 
												by — Providence so ordering it 
												that he should come by thus 
												opportunely when the matter was 
												ready to be proposed to him. 
												Great affairs are frequently 
												much furthered and expedited by 
												small circumstances.
 
 Verse 2
 Ruth 4:2. He took ten men — To 
												be witnesses; for though two or 
												three witnesses were sufficient, 
												yet in weightier matters they 
												used more. And ten was the usual 
												number among the Jews in causes 
												of matrimony and divorce, and 
												translation of inheritances; who 
												were both judges of the causes 
												and witnesses of the fact.
 
 Verse 3
 Ruth 4:3. Naomi — Both Naomi and 
												Ruth had an interest in this 
												land during their lives, but he 
												mentions only Naomi, because all 
												was done by her direction; lest 
												the mention of Ruth should raise 
												a suspicion of the necessity of 
												his marrying Ruth, before he had 
												given his answer to the first 
												proposition. Which was our 
												brother Elimelech’s — He calls 
												him their brother, because he 
												was near of kin to them. And he 
												mentions Naomi’s return out of 
												the country of Moab, to intimate 
												that her poverty constrained her 
												to sell her estate which her 
												husband left her.
 
 Verse 4-5
 Ruth 4:4-5. I thought to 
												advertise thee — I have had it 
												in my mind to speak to thee 
												about it. There is none to 
												redeem it besides thee — That 
												is, thou hast the first right to 
												do so; for it is plain Boaz had 
												a right, but it was in the 
												second place: and if he had 
												refused, the next kinsman would 
												have had the right, and so on. 
												Thou must buy it also of Ruth — 
												According to the law, 
												Deuteronomy 25:5. To raise up 
												seed — To revive his name, which 
												was buried with his body, by 
												raising up a seed to him to be 
												called by his name.
 
 Verse 6
 Ruth 4:6. Lest I mar mine own 
												inheritance — It seems he had a 
												wife and children already, which 
												made him afraid to marry a poor 
												woman with a small parcel of 
												land, which would not provide 
												for the children he might have 
												by her, lest he should thereby 
												diminish the inheritance of 
												which he was already possessed. 
												The Chaldee paraphrase on the 
												passage is, “I cannot redeem it 
												on this condition,” namely, the 
												condition of marrying Ruth; 
												“because I have a wife already, 
												and do not choose to bring 
												another into my house, lest 
												quarrels and divisions arise in 
												it, and I hurt my own 
												inheritance.”
 
 Verse 7
 Ruth 4:7. Now this was the 
												manner in Israel, &c. — We do 
												not know that there was any law 
												of God enjoining any such 
												ceremony as is here mentioned; 
												but only it was a 
												long-established custom to act 
												thus in transferring one man’s 
												right in any land to another. To 
												confirm all things — That is, in 
												all alienation of lands. So that 
												it is no wonder if this ceremony 
												differ a little from that 
												mentioned Deuteronomy 25:9, 
												because that concerned only one 
												case, but this is more general. 
												Besides, he alleges, not the 
												command of God, but only ancient 
												custom for this practice. A man 
												plucked off his shoe, and gave 
												it to his neighbour — That is, 
												he who relinquished his right to 
												another did this. The reason of 
												the custom, as Bishop Patrick 
												observes, is plain enough, “it 
												being a natural signification 
												that the man resigned his 
												interest in the land by giving 
												to the person redeeming his shoe 
												wherewith he used to walk in it, 
												to the end that he might enter 
												into it, and take possession of 
												it himself.” Or it might signify 
												that as he pulled off, and 
												divested himself of his shoe, so 
												he divested himself of that 
												which he was about to surrender. 
												“It is now the custom with us,” 
												says Rabbi Jarchi, “that a 
												handkerchief or veil be given, 
												instead of a shoe, when we 
												purchase any thing.” This was a 
												testimony in Israel — This was 
												admitted for sufficient evidence 
												in all such cases.
 
 Verse 10
 Ruth 4:10. Ruth the Moabitess 
												have I purchased to be my wife — 
												He had her by the right of the 
												same purchase, and did not 
												succeed into the right of a 
												brother, as mentioned 
												Deuteronomy 25.; for he was not 
												a brother to Elimelech, but only 
												a remote kinsman of the same 
												family, who could not enjoy the 
												land while she lived, unless he 
												would take her with it; to whom 
												it belonged while she lived, and 
												was to go to her issue when she 
												died. From the gate of his place 
												— That is, from among the 
												inhabitants dwelling within the 
												gate of his city, which was 
												Beth-lehem-judah.
 
 Verse 11
 Ruth 4:11. Rachel and Leah — 
												Amiable and fruitful. These two 
												are singled out, because they 
												were of a foreign original, and 
												yet ingrafted into God’s people, 
												as Ruth was; and because of that 
												fertility which God vouchsafed 
												unto them above their 
												predecessors, Sarah and Rebecca. 
												Rachel is placed before Leah, 
												because she was his most lawful 
												and best beloved wife. Which two 
												did build the house of Israel — 
												Were blessed with a numerous 
												posterity. They do not mention 
												the two handmaids, because the 
												former were Jacob’s principal 
												wives, whose servants bare 
												children not for themselves, but 
												their mistresses.
 
 Verse 12
 Ruth 4:12. Like the house of 
												Pharez — As honourable and 
												numerous as his family was; 
												whom, though he also was born of 
												a stranger, God so blessed, that 
												his family was one of the five 
												families to which all the tribe 
												of Judah belonged, and the 
												progenitor of the inhabitants of 
												this city.
 
 Verse 13
 Ruth 4:13. Took Ruth — Which he 
												might do, though she was a 
												Moabitess, because the 
												prohibition against marrying 
												such is to be restrained to 
												those who continued heathen; 
												whereas Ruth was a sincere 
												proselyte and convert to the God 
												of Israel. Thus he that forsakes 
												all for Christ, shall find more 
												than all with him.
 
 Verse 14
 Ruth 4:14. The women said unto 
												Naomi — After Ruth’s delivery. 
												Which hath not left thee without 
												a kinsman — The words may be 
												rendered, who hath not made, or 
												suffered, thy kinsman to fail 
												thee; that is, to refuse to 
												perform his duty to thee and 
												thine, as the other kinsman did. 
												The Hebrew גאל, goel, which we 
												translate kinsman, properly 
												belonged to Boaz, and not to his 
												son who was born; and yet the 
												women seem to speak this with a 
												reference to the child, which 
												probably induced the Arabic 
												translator to render it, hath 
												not left thee without an heir. 
												That his name may — Hebrew, and 
												his name shall be famous in 
												Israel; On account of this noble 
												and worthy action.
 
 Verse 15
 Ruth 4:15. A restorer of thy 
												life — Of the comfort of thy 
												life, such a comfort as to make 
												thee, in some sort, young again. 
												For they hoped the child would 
												inherit his mother’s virtues, 
												and particularly her affection 
												to Naomi, which was so 
												surpassing, that it made her a 
												greater blessing to her than a 
												great many children of her own 
												body would have been. Better 
												than seven sons — See how God 
												sometimes makes up the want of 
												those relations from whom we 
												expected most comfort, in those 
												from whom we expected least! The 
												bonds of love prove stronger 
												than those of nature.
 
 Verse 17
 Ruth 4:17. Her neighbours gave 
												it a name — That is, gave her 
												advice about his name; for it 
												did not belong to them, but to 
												the father or mother, to name 
												the child. They called his name 
												Obed — That is, a servant, 
												meaning to express their hopes 
												that he would nourish, comfort, 
												and assist her, duties which 
												children owe to their 
												progenitors. He is the father of 
												Jesse, the father of David — For 
												whose sake chiefly this whole 
												book seems to have been written, 
												that it might be certainly known 
												from whom he was descended, the 
												Messiah being to spring from 
												him; which is the reason why the 
												following genealogy is annexed 
												for the conclusion of this book.
 |