| The following history 
												has been compiled from Wesley's 
												Works, the British and American 
												Minutes of Conferences, Moore's 
												and Watson's Life of the Wesleys, 
												Asbury's Journal, Lee's History 
												of the Methodists, the Life of 
												Dr. Coke, Lee's and Garrettson's 
												Memoirs, Abbott's Life, from 
												historical notices and anecdotes 
												of Methodism found in the 
												Arminian and Methodist 
												Magazines, the Methodist 
												Magazine and Quarterly Review, 
												the Christian Advocate and 
												Journal, together with such 
												original anecdotes and 
												historical sketches as I have 
												been able to collect from the 
												lips of living persons.
 For the facts contained in the 
												Introduction, I am indebted 
												chiefly to Bancroft's "History 
												of the Colonization of the 
												United States" -- a work of rare 
												merit and of incomparable worth 
												to the student of American 
												history -- collating it, 
												however, with others who have 
												written upon the same subject. 
												It would have been no less 
												gratifying to me than edifying 
												to the reader, had it been in my 
												power to give a more particular 
												account of the religious state 
												of the colonies from the 
												beginning to about the middle of 
												the eighteenth Century; but the 
												space allowed in a short 
												introduction to the history of 
												one denomination of Christians 
												would not admit of a more ample 
												detail of general facts in 
												relation to that period of our 
												colonial history.
 
 About sixteen years since I 
												commenced writing a "History of 
												the Methodist Episcopal Church," 
												and had actually brought it down 
												to about the year 1810; but the 
												whole manuscript was consumed by 
												the disastrous fire which 
												destroyed our Book Room and its 
												valuable contents in the winter 
												of 1836. Of this casualty I was 
												not apprised until my return 
												from the last General 
												Conference, when, on searching 
												my private desk at home, where I 
												thought it had been deposited, 
												my manuscript was not to be 
												found; and hence the fact was 
												disclosed that it must have been 
												consumed, together with some 
												other documents of a similar 
												character, in the conflagration 
												of our book depository.
 
 It was under the impression that 
												my manuscript was in existence 
												that I asked and obtained 
												liberty of the General 
												Conference, in 1836, to have 
												access to their journals and 
												documents, to enable me to 
												complete my design with the 
												greater accuracy and more in 
												detail. Of this privilege, 
												however, I have not been able to 
												make any use in the present 
												volume, as I can find no journal 
												of the proceedings of any 
												General Conference of an earlier 
												date than the year 1800. But 
												should my life and health be 
												spared to complete my work by 
												adding a second volume, I trust 
												I shall be enabled to enrich it 
												with such extracts from those 
												journals as will be found 
												interesting to the general 
												reader, and particularly to 
												those to whom the affairs of the 
												church may hereafter be 
												committed.
 
 This latter period of our 
												history abounds in materials, 
												while that embraced in the 
												present volume is, in some 
												respects, comparatively barren, 
												as but few of those who were 
												instrumental in planting 
												Methodism in this country have 
												left particular records of their 
												labors and sufferings, with 
												which the page of history might 
												be enriched. The sources, 
												however, whence my information 
												is derived, are of the most 
												authentic character; and I trust 
												it will not be devoid of 
												interest and instruction to 
												those who take pleasure in 
												surveying the stones of our 
												temple, and of comparing its 
												present with its past condition, 
												and of anticipating its future 
												prospects and success. But 
												though the materials for 
												furnishing a very particular 
												history of the early days of 
												Methodism in these United States 
												are comparatively sparse, when 
												viewed in their scattered and 
												insulated condition; yet when 
												carefully collected and put 
												together in consecutive order, 
												they cannot fail to form an 
												interesting and instructive 
												medium of information; and more 
												especially to those whose 
												spiritual welfare is identified 
												with this humble branch of the 
												church of Jesus Christ. This I 
												have endeavored to do, according 
												to the best of my ability, and 
												hope that whatever errors may be 
												detected by the candid and 
												critical reader, they will be 
												attributed to their proper 
												source, and pointed out with 
												that spirit of friendliness 
												which will ensure their 
												correction.
 
 In speaking of the authorities 
												on which I have relied for 
												information in the compilation 
												of this history, I feel it an 
												act of justice to refer 
												particularly to Lee's History of 
												the Methodists, and to Bishop 
												Asbury's Journal, principally 
												because I think they have not 
												been appreciated according to 
												their worth.
 
 Though, considered as a whole, 
												the Journal of Bishop Asbury is 
												somewhat dry and monotonous, on 
												account of its diurnal details 
												of incidents of a private 
												character; yet the historian of 
												Methodism will find it a rich 
												depository of important facts, 
												illustrative of the rise and 
												progress of the work of God in 
												this country; and he will be 
												both delighted and astonished at 
												the immense labors and no little 
												sufferings which this man of God 
												performed and endured in this 
												holy cause. With a view to do 
												justice to his character, I have 
												made Bishop Asbury the principal 
												hero of the narrative, borrowing 
												freely from his journals 
												whatever might tend to throw 
												light upon the subject and to 
												present fairly and fully the 
												active part which he took in the 
												erection of this spiritual 
												building. He was the father of 
												Methodism in this country, and, 
												as such, deserves a conspicuous 
												place in that temple which his 
												own hands contributed so 
												effectually to erect, that his 
												sons in the gospel and 
												successors in the ministry may 
												look to him as an exemplar for 
												their imitation, and be 
												stimulated and strengthened in 
												their work.
 
 As to Lee's History, though it 
												might have been more amplified 
												in some particulars, and less 
												minute in others, yet I consider 
												it the most important narrative 
												we have of early Methodism in 
												these United States, and a most 
												valuable textbook for the future 
												historian. Next to Bishop 
												Asbury, Mr. Lee traveled the 
												most extensively through the 
												country, and took an active and 
												important part in the various 
												transactions of the church, both 
												in the Annual and General 
												Conferences, as well as in the 
												field of itinerancy, being a 
												preacher of most indefatigable 
												industry and steady 
												perseverance. And, what enabled 
												him to state the facts which he 
												has recorded in his history with 
												the greatest accuracy, he also 
												kept a daily record of his 
												travels, and marked with the eye 
												of a keen and attentive observer 
												whatever came within the circle 
												of his observation.1 
												Hence many parts of his 
												narrative are made up, 
												particularly those which relate 
												to Methodism in some of the 
												southern states and in New 
												England, from his own knowledge 
												and experience. On him, 
												therefore, I have freely drawn 
												for whatever might tend to 
												answer my main design, in 
												presenting to the reader a 
												faithful history of the rise and 
												progress of the Methodist 
												Episcopal Church in these United 
												States.
 
 In some instances, however, I 
												have found, in collating them, 
												that the printed Minutes and Mr. 
												Lee, particularly in respect to 
												numbers, disagree; and in such 
												cases the preference has always 
												been given to the public and 
												authorized documents of the 
												church.
 
 These remarks have been made in 
												reference to these two authors, 
												not with a view to disparage in 
												the least degree others who have 
												written upon the same subject, 
												but chiefly, as before said, 
												because it is believed that 
												their respective merits have not 
												been duly appreciated. And 
												though Mr. Lee might have been 
												led from some cause to withhold 
												somewhat of that mood of praise 
												which was justly due to Bishop 
												Asbury, on account of which the 
												latter was not well pleased with 
												his history, yet impartial 
												posterity will do justice to 
												them both; and while is awarded 
												to the first historian of 
												American Methodism the merit of 
												collecting and recording facts 
												with fidelity, to Bishop Asbury 
												will be given the praise of 
												having contributed more largely 
												than any one else in this 
												country, and in his day, to the 
												planting, watering, and pruning 
												this tree of righteousness, as 
												well as of having left a 
												faithful record of such events 
												as furnish the historian with 
												materials for his work. To only 
												a small part of this record had 
												Mr. Lee access, as but a small 
												portion of the journals was 
												published until some years after 
												his history was written; and 
												hence the present history has 
												the advantage of its predecessor 
												in being able to incorporate in 
												its pages much valuable 
												information unknown to Mr. Lee. 
												It has also enriched its pages 
												with matter which, though it 
												might have been in existence, 
												was either beyond the reach of 
												the writer, or was not deemed of 
												sufficient importance to demand 
												his attention.
 
 Having thus discharged what I 
												consider an obligation to this 
												greater and lesser light of 
												Methodism, both of whom are now 
												doubtlessly enjoying together 
												the reward of their labors and 
												sufferings in the cause of 
												Christ, I proceed to say, that I 
												hesitated for some time whether 
												or not to refer in the margin to 
												every authority I might quote, 
												or on whom I might draw for the 
												facts embodied in the history, 
												or merely to make a general 
												reference, as is done in the 
												commencement of this preface. As 
												such perpetual references would 
												considerably swell the body of 
												the work, without adding any 
												thing to the stock of 
												information, or to the 
												authenticity of the facts 
												detailed, it was thought most 
												advisable to adopt the latter 
												course. In most instances, 
												however, when any important 
												matter is introduced into the 
												thread of the narrative, or the 
												language of others has been 
												used, due credit has been given 
												by a reference to the proper 
												authority. That the blessing of 
												God may accompany this effort to 
												trace his providence and grace 
												in his watch-care over this 
												branch of his church, and that 
												it may continue to be showered 
												abundantly upon his heritage, 
												until his "dominion shall be 
												from sea even to sea, and from 
												the river even to the ends of 
												the earth," the author would 
												unite his fervent prayers with 
												all those who love our Lord 
												Jesus Christ in sincerity.
 
 N. Bangs. New 
												York, July 14, 1838.
 |