Free Grace
Preached at Bristol,
in the year 1740
To The Reader:
Nothing but the strongest conviction, not only that what is
here advanced is “the truth as it is in Jesus,” but also that I am indispensably
obliged to declare this truth to all the world, could have induced me openly to
oppose the sentiments of those whom I esteem for their work’s sake: At whose
feet may I be found in the day of the Lord Jesus!
Should any believe it his duty to reply hereto, I have only one
request to make, — Let whatsoever you do, be done inherently, in love, and in
the spirit of meekness. Let your very disputing show that you have “put on, as
the elect of God, bowel of mercies, gentleness, longsuffering; “that even
according to this time it may be said, “See how these Christians love one
another!”
Whereas a pamphlet entitled, “Free Grace Indeed,” has been
published against this Sermon; this is to inform the publisher, that I cannot
answer his tract till he appears to be more in earnest. For I dare not speak of
“the deep things of God” in the spirit of a prize-fighter or a
stage-player.
“He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us
all, how
shall he not with him also freely give us all things?”
Rom. 8:32
1. How freely does God love the world! While we were yet
sinners, “Christ died for the ungodly.” While we were “dead in our sin,” God
“spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all.” And how freely with
him does he “give us all things!” Verily, FREE GRACE is all in all!
2. The grace or love of God, whence cometh our salvation, is
FREE IN ALL, and FREE FOR ALL.
3. First. It is free in all to whom it is given. It does
not
depend on any power or merit in man; no, not in any degree,
neither in whole, nor in part. It does not in anywise depend either on the good
works or righteousness of the receiver; not on anything he has done, or anything
he is. It does not depend on his endeavors. It does not depend on his good
tempers, or good desires, or good purposes and intentions; for all these flow
from the free grace of God; they are the streams only, not the fountain. They
are the fruits of free grace, and not the root. They are not the cause, but the
effects of it. Whatsoever good is in man, or is done by man, God is the author
and doer of it. Thus is his grace free in all; that is, no way depending on any
power or merit in man, but on God alone, who freely gave us his own Son, and
“with him freely giveth us all things.
4. But it is free for ALL, as well as IN ALL. To this some
have answered, “No: It is free only for those whom God hath ordained to life;
and they are but a little flock. The greater part of God hath ordained to death;
and it is not free for them. Them God hateth; and, therefore, before they were
born, decreed they should die eternally. And this he absolutely decreed; because
so was his good pleasure; because it was his sovereign will. Accordingly, they
are born for this, — to be destroyed body and soul in hell. And they grow up
under the irrevocable curse of God, without any possibility of redemption; for
what grace God gives. he gives only for this, to increase, not prevent, their
damnation.”
5. This that decree of predestination. But methinks I hear one
say, “This is not the predestination which I hold: I hold only the election of
grace. What I believe is not more than this, — that God,, before the foundation
of the world, did elect a certain number of men to be justified, sanctified, and
glorified. Now, all these will be saved, and none else; for the rest of mankind
God leaves to themselves: So they follow the imaginations of their own hearts,
which are only evil continually, and, waxing worse and worse, are at length
justly punished with everlasting destruction.”
6. Is this all the predestination which you hold? Consider;
perhaps this is not all. Do not you believe God ordained them to this very
thing” If so, you believe the whole degree; you hold predestination in the full
sense which has been above described. But it may be you think you do not. Do not
you then believe, God hardens the hearts of them that perish: Do not you
believe, he (literally) hardened Pharaoh’s heart; and that for this end he
raised him up, or created him? Why, this amounts to just the same thing. If you
believe Pharaoh, or any one man upon earth, was created for this end, — to be
damned, — you hold all that has been said of predestination. And there is no
need you should add, that God seconds his degree, which is supposed unchangeable
and irresistible, by hardening the hearts of those vessels of wrath whom that
decree had before fitted for destruction.
7. well, but it may be you do not believe even this; you do
not hold any decree of reprobation; you do not think God decrees any man to be
damned, not hardens, irresistibly fits him, for damnation; you only say, “God
eternally decreed, that all being dead in sin, he would say to some of the dry
bones, Live, and to others he would not; that, consequently, these should be
made alive, and those abide in death, — these should glorify God by their
salvation, and those by their destruction.”
8. Is not this what you mean by the election of grace? If it
be, I would ask one or two question: Are any who are not thus elected saved? or
were any, from the foundation of the world? Is it possible any man should be
saved unless he be thus elected? If you say, “No,” you are but where you was;
you are not got one hair’s breadth farther; you still believe, that, in
consequence of an unchangeable, irresistible decree of God, the greater part of
mankind abide in death, without any possibility of redemption; inasmuch as none
can save them but God, and he will not save them. You believe he hath absolutely
decreed not to save them; and what is this but decreeing to damn them? It is, in
effect, neither more not less; it comes to the same thing; for if you are dead,
and altogether unable to make yourself alive, then, if God has absolutely
decreed he will make only others alive, and not you, he hath absolutely decreed
your everlasting death; you are absolutely consigned to damnation. So then,
though you use softer words than some, you mean the self-same thing; and God’s
decree concerning the election of grace, according to your account of it,
amounts to neither more not less than what others call God’s decree of
reprobation.
9. Call it therefore by whatever name you please, election,
preterition, predestination, or reprobation, it comes in the end to the same
thing. The sense of all is plainly this, — by virtue of an eternal,
unchangeable, irresistible decree of God, on part of mankind are infallibly
saved, and the rest infallibly damned; it being impossible that any of the
former should be damned. or that any of the latter should be saved.
10. But if this be so, then is all preaching vain. It is
needless to them that are elected; for they, whether with preaching or without,
will infallibly be saved. Therefore, the end of preaching — to save should — is
void with regard to them; and it is useless to them that are not elected, for
they cannot possibly be saved: They, whether with preaching or without, will
infallibly be damned. The end of preaching is therefore void with regard to them
likewise; so that in either case our preaching is vain, as you hearing is also
vain.
11. This then, is a plain proof that the doctrine of
predestination is not a doctrine of God, because it makes void the ordinance of
God; and God is not divided against himself. A Second is, that it directly tends
to destroy that holiness which is the end of all the ordinances of God. I do not
say, none who hold it are holy; (for God is of tender mercy to those who are
unavoidably entangled in errors of any kind;) but that the doctrine itself, —
that every man is either elected or not elected from eternity, and that the one
must inevitably be saved, and the other inevitably damned, — has a manifest
tendency to destroy holiness in general; for it wholly takes away those first
motives to follow after it, so frequently proposed in Scripture, the hope of
future reward and fear of punishment, the hope of heaven and fear of hell. That
these shall go away into everlasting punishment, and those into life eternal, is
not motive to him to struggle for life who believes his lot is cast already; it
is not reasonable for him so to do, if he thinks he is unalterably adjudged
either to life or death. You will say, “But he knows not whether it is life or
death.” What then? — this helps not the matter; for if a sick man knows that he
must unavoidably die, or unavoidably recover, though he knows not which, it is
unreasonable for him to take any physic at all. He might justly say, (and so I
have heard some speak, both in bodily sickness and in spiritual,) “If I am
ordained to life, I shall live; if to death, I shall live; so I need not trouble
myself about it.” So directly does this doctrine tend to shut the very gate of
holiness in general, — to hinder unholy men from ever approaching thereto, or
striving to enter in thereat.
12. as directly does this doctrine tend to destroy several
particular branches of holiness. Such are meekness and love, — love, I mean, of
our enemies, — of the evil and unthankful. I say not, that none who hold it have
meekness and love; (for as is the power of God, so is his mercy;) but that it
naturally tends to inspire, or increase, a sharpness or eagerness of temper,
which is quite contrary to the meekness of Christ; as then especially appears,
when they are opposed on this head. And it as naturally inspires contempt or
coldness towards those whom we suppose outcast form God. “O but,” you say. “I
suppose no particular man a reprobate.” You mean you would not if you could help
it: But you cannot help sometimes applying your general doctrine to particular
persons: The enemy of souls will apply it for you. You know how often he has
done so. But you rejected the thought with abhorrence. True; as soon as you
could; but how did it sour and sharpen your spirit in the mean time! you well
know it was not the spirit of love which you then felt towards that poor sinner,
whom you supposed or suspected, whether you would or no, to have been hated of
God from eternity.
13. Thirdly. This doctrine tends to destroy the comfort of
religion, the happiness of Christianity. This is evident as to all those who
believe themselves to be reprobated, or who only suspect or fear it. All the
great and precious promises are lost to them; they afford them no ray of
comfort: For they are not the elect of God; therefore they have neither lot nor
portion in them. This is an effectual bar to their finding any comfort or
happiness, even in that religion whose ways are designed to be “ways of
pleasantness, and all her paths peace.”
14. And as to you who believe yourselves the elect of God,
what is your happiness? I hoe, not a notion, a speculative belief, a bare
opinion of any kind; but a feeling possession of God in your heart, wrought in
you by the Holy Ghost, or, the witness of God’s Spirit with your spirit that you
are a child of God. This, otherwise termed “the full assurance of faith,: is the
true ground of a Christian’s happiness. And it does indeed imply a full
assurance that all your past sins are forgiven, and that you are
now a
child of God. But it does not necessarily imply a full assurance of our future
perseverance. I do not say this is never joined to it, but that it is not
necessarily implied therein; for many have the one who have not the other.
15. Now, this witness of the Spirit experience shows to be
much obstructed by this doctrine; and not only in those who, Believing
themselves reprobated, by this belief thrust it far from them, but even in them
that have tasted of that good gift, who yet have soon lost it again, and fallen
back into doubts, and fears, and darkness, — horrible darkness, that might be
felt! And I appeal to any of you who hold this doctrine, to say, between God and
your own hearts, whether you have not often a return of doubts and fears
concerning your election or perseverance! If you ask, “Who has not?” I answer,
Very few of those that hold this doctrine; but many, very many, of those that
hold it not, in all parts of the earth; — many of these have enjoyed the
uninterrupted witness of his Spirit, the continual light of his countenance,
from the moment wherein they first believed, for many months or years, to this
day.
16. That assurance of faith which these enjoy excludes all
doubt and fear, It excludes all kinds of doubt and fear concerning their future
perseverance; though it is not properly, as was said before, an assurance of
what is future, but only of what now is. And this needs not for its
support a speculative belief, that whoever is once ordained to life must live;
for it is wrought from hour to hour, by the mighty power of God, “by the Holy
Ghost which is given unto them.” And therefore that doctrine is not of God,
because it tends to obstruct, if not destroy, this great work of the Holy Ghost,
whence flows the chief comfort of religion, the happiness of Christianity.
17. Again: How uncomfortable a thought is this, that thousands
and millions of men, without any preceding offense or fault of theirs, were
unchangeably doomed to everlasting burnings! How peculiarly uncomfortable must
it be to those who have put on Christ! to those who, being filled with bowels of
mercy, tenderness, and compassion, could even “wish themselves accursed for
their brethren’s sake!”
18. Fourthly. This uncomfortable doctrine directly tends to
destroy our zeal for good works. And this it does, First, as it naturally tends
(according to what was observed before) to destroy our love to the greater part
of mankind, namely, the evil and unthankful. For whatever lessens our love, must
go far lessen our desire to do them good. This it does, Secondly, as it cuts off
one of the strongest motives to all acts of bodily mercy, such as feeding the
hungry, clothing the naked, and the like, — viz., the hope of saving their souls
from death. For what avails it to relieve their temporal wants, who are just
dropping into eternal fire? “Well; but run and snatch them as brands out of the
fire.: Nay, this you suppose impossible. They were appointed thereunto, you say,
from eternity, before they had done either good or evil. you believe it is the
will of God they should die. And “who hath resisted his will?” But you say you
do not know whether these are elected or not. What then? If you know they are
the one or the other, — that they are either elected or not elected, — all your
labour is void and vain. In either case, your advice, reproof, or exhortation is
as needless and useless as our preaching. It is needless to them that are
elected; for they will infallibly be saved without it. It is useless to them
that are not elected; for with or without it they will infallibly be damned;
therefore you cannot consistently with your principles take any pains about
their salvation. Consequently, those principles directly tend to destroy you
zeal for good works; for all good works; but particularly for the greatest of
all, the saving of souls from death.
19. But, Fifthly, this doctrine not only tends to destroy
Christian holiness, happiness, and good works, but hath also a direct and
manifest tendency to overthrow the whole Christian Revelation. The point which
the wisest of the modern unbelievers most industriously labour to prove, is,
that the Christian Revelation is not necessary. They well know, could they once
show this, the conclusion would be too plain to be denied, “If it be not
necessary, it is not true,” Now, this fundamental point you give up. For
supposing that eternal, unchangeable decree, one part of mankind must be saved,
though the Christian Revelation were not in being, and the other part of mankind
must be damned, notwithstanding that Revelation. And what would an infidel
desire more? You allow him all he asks. In making the gospel thus unnecessary to
all sorts of men, you give up the whole Christian cause. “O tell it not in Gath!
lest the daughters of the uncircumcised rejoice; “lest the sons of unbelief
triumph!
20. And as this doctrine manifestly and directly tends to
overthrow the whole Christian Revelation, so it does the same thing, by plain
consequence, in making that Revelation contradict itself. For it is grounded on
such an interpretation of some texts (more or fewer it matters not) as flatly
contradicts all the other texts, and indeed the whole scope and tenor of
Scripture. For instance: The assertors of this doctrine interpret that text of
Scripture, “Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated,” as implying that God in
a literal sense hated Esau, and all the reprobated, from eternity. Now, what can
possibly be a more flat contradiction than this, not only to the whole scope and
tenor of Scripture, but also to all those particular texts which expressly
declare, “God is love?” Again: They infer from that text, “I will have mercy on
whom I will have mercy,” (Romans 4:15) that God is
love only to some men, viz.,the elect, and that he hath mercy for those only;
flatly contrary to which is the whole tenor of Scripture, as is that express
declaration in particular, “The Lord is loving unto every man; and his mercy is
over all his works.” (Psalm 145:9.) Again: They
infer from that and the like texts, “It is not of him that willeth, nor of him
that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy,: that he showeth mercy only to
those to whom he had respect from all eternity. Nay, but who replieth against
God now? You now contradict the whole oracles of God, which declare throughout,
“God is no respecter of persons:’ (Acts
10:34) “There is no respect of persons with him.” (Rom. 2:11.) Again: from that text, “The children
being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of
God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth; it
was said unto her,” unto Rebecca, “The elder shall serve the younger;“you infer,
that our being predestinated, or elect, no way depends on the foreknowledge of
God. Flatly contrary to this are all the scriptures; and those in particular,
“Elect according to the foreknowledge of God;” (1 Peter
1:2; ) “Whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate.” (Rom. 8:29.)
21. And “the same Lord over all is rich” in mercy “to all that
call upon him:” (Romans 10:12:) But you
say, “No; he is such only to those for whom Christ died. And those are not all,
but only a few, whom God hath chosen out of the world; for he died not for all,
but only for those who were ‘chosen in him before the foundation of the world.’”
(Eph. 1:4.) Flatly contrary to your interpretation
of these scriptures, also, is the whole tenor of the New Testament; as are in
particular those texts: — “Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom Christ died,”
(Rom. 14:15, ) — a clear proof that Christ died,
not only for those that are saved, but also for them that perish: He is “the
Saviour of the world;” (John 4:42; ) He is “the
Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world;” (John
1:29; ) “He is the propitiation, not for our sins only, but also for
the sins of the whole world;” (1 John
2:2; ) “He,” the living God, “is the Savior of all men;” (1 Timothy 4:10; ) “He gave himself a ransom for
all;” (1 Tim. 2:6; ) “He tasted
death for every man.” (Heb. 2:9.)
22. If you ask, “Why then are not all men saved?” the whole
law and the testimony answer, First, Not because of any decree of God; not
because it is his pleasure they should die; for, As I live, saith the Lord God,”
I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth.” (Ezek.
18:3, 32.) Whatever be the
cause of their perishing, it cannot be his will, if the oracles of God are true;
for they declare, “He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should
come to repentance;” (2 Pet. 3:9; ) “He willeth
that all men should be saved.” And they, Secondly, declare what is the cause why
all men are not saved, namely, that they will not be saved: So our Lord
expressly, “Ye will not come unto me that ye may have life.” (John 5:40.) “The power of the Lord is present to
heal” them, but they will not be healed. “They reject the counsel,” the merciful
counsel, “of God against themselves,” as did their stiff-necked forefathers. And
therefore are they without excuse; because God would save them, but they will
not be saved: This is the condemnation, “How often would I have gathered you
together, and ye would not!” (Matt.
23:37.)
23. Thus manifestly does this doctrine tend to overthrow the
whole Christian Revelation, by making it contradict itself; by giving such an
interpretation of some texts, as flatly contradicts all the other texts, and
indeed the whole scope and tenor of Scripture; — an abundant proof that it is
not of God. But neither is this all: For, Seventhly, it is a doctrine full of
blasphemy; of such blasphemy as I should dread to mention, but that the honour
of our gracious God, and the cause of his truth, will not suffer me to be
silent. In the cause of God, then, and from a sincere concern for the glory of
his great name, I will mention a few of the horrible blasphemies contained in
this horrible doctrine. But first, I must warn every one of you that hears, as
ye will answer it at the great day, not to charge me (as some have done) with
blaspheming, because I mention the blasphemy of others. And the more you are
grieve with them that do thus blaspheme, see that ye “confirm your love towards
them: the more, and that your heart’s desire, and continual prayer to God, be,
“Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do!”
24. This premised, let it be observed, that this doctrine
represents our blessed Lord, “Jesus Christ the righteous,” “the only begotten
Son of the Father, full of grace and truth,” as an hypocrite, a deceiver of the
people, a man void of common sincerity. For it cannot be denied, that he
everywhere speaks as if he was willing that all men should be saved. Therefore,
to say he was not willing that all men should be saved, is to represent him as a
mere hypocrite and dissembler. It cannot be denied that the gracious words which
came out of his mouth are full of invitations to all sinners. To say, then, he
did not intend to save all sinners, is to represent him as a gross deceiver of
the people. You cannot deny that he says, “Come unto me, all ye that are weary
and heavy laden.” If, then, you say he calls those that cannot come; those whom
he knows to be unable to come; those whom he can make able to come, but will
not; how is it possible to describe greater insincerity? You represent him as
mocking his helpless creatures, by offering what he never intends to give. You
describe him as saying on thing, and meaning another; as pretending the love
which his had not. Him, in “whose mouth was no guile,” you make full of deceit,
void of common sincerity; — then especially, when, drawing nigh the city, He
wept over it, and said, “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou killest the prophets, and
stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy
children together, — and ye would not;” ethelesakai ouk ethelesate. Now, if you say,
they
would, but he would not, you represent him (which who could hear?) as
weeping crocodiles’ tears; weeping over the prey which himself had doomed to
destruction!
25. Such blasphemy this, as one would think might make the
ears of a Christian to tingle! But there is yet more behind; for just as it
honours the Son, so doth this doctrine honour the Father. It destroys all his
attributes at once: It overturns both his justice, mercy, and truth; yea, it
represents the most holy God as worse than the devil, as both more false, more
cruel, and more unjust. More false; because the devil, liar as he is,
hath never said, “He willeth all men to be saved:” More
unjust; because
the devil cannot, if he would, be guilty of such injustice as you ascribe to
God, when you say that God condemned millions of souls to everlasting fire,
prepared for the devil and his angels, for continuing in sin, which, for want of
that grace he will not give them, they cannot avoid: And more
cruel; because that unhappy spirit “seeketh rest and findeth none;” so
that his own restless misery is a kind of temptation to him to tempt others. But
God resteth in his high and holy place; so that to suppose him, of his own mere
motion, of his pure will and pleasure, happy as he is, to doom his creatures,
whether they will or no, to endless misery, is to impute such cruelty to him as
we cannot impute even to the great enemy of God and man. It is to represent the
high God (he that hath ears to hear let him hear!) as more cruel, false, and
unjust than the devil!
26. This is the blasphemy clearly contained in
the horrible
decree of predestination! And here I fix my foot. On this I join issue with
every assertor of it. You represent God as worse than the devil; more false,
more cruel, more unjust. But you say you will prove it by scripture. Hold! What
will you prove by Scripture? that God is worse than the devil? I cannot be.
Whatever that Scripture proves, it never an prove this; whatever its true
meaning be. This cannot be its true meaning. Do you ask, “What is its true
meaning then?” If I say, “I know not,” you have gained nothing; for there are
many scriptures the true sense whereof neither you nor I shall know till death
is swallowed up in victory. But this I know, better it were to say it had no
sense, than to say it had such a sense as this. It cannot mean, whatever it mean
besides, that the God of truth is a liar. Let it mean what it will it cannot
mean that the Judge of all the world is unjust. No scripture can mean that God
is not love, or that his mercy is not over all his works; that is, whatever it
prove beside, no scripture can prove predestination.
27. This is the blasphemy for which (however I love the
persons who assert it) I abhor the doctrine of predestination, a doctrine, upon
the supposition of which, if one could possibly suppose it for a moment, (call
it election, reprobation, or what you please, for all comes to the same thing,)
one might say to our adversary, the devil, “Thou fool, why dost thou roar about
any longer? Thy lying in wait for souls is as needless and useless as our
preaching. Hearest thou not, that God hath taken thy work out of thy hands; and
that he doeth it much more effectually? Thou, with all thy principalities and
powers, canst only so assault that we may resist thee; but He can irresistibly
destroy both body and soul in hell! Thou canst only entice; but his unchangeable
decrees, to leave thousands of souls in death, compels them to continue in sin,
till they drop into everlasting burnings. Thou temptest; He forceth us to be
damned; for we cannot resist his will. Thou fool, why goest thou about any
longer, seeking whom thou mayest devour? Hearest thou not that God is the
devouring lion, the destroyer of souls, the murderer of men” Moloch caused only
children to pass though the fire: and that fire was soon quenched; or, the
corruptible body being consumed, its torment was at an end; but God, thou are
told, by his eternal decree, fixed before they had done good or evil, causes,
not only children of a span long, but the parents also, to pass through the fire
of hell, the ‘fire which never shall be quenched; and the body which is cast
thereinto, being now incorruptible and immortal, will be ever consuming and
never consumed, but ‘the smoke of their torment,’ because it is God’s good
pleasure, ‘ascendeth up for ever and ever.’”
28. O how would the enemy of God and man rejoice to hear these
things were so! How would he cry aloud and spare not! How would he lift up his
voice and say, “To your tents, O Israel! Flee from the face of this God, or ye
shall utterly perish! But whither will ye flee? Into heaven? He is there, Down
to hell? He is there also. Ye cannot flee from an omnipresent, almighty tyrant.
And whether ye flee or stay, I call heaven, his throne, and earth, his
footstool, to witness against you, ye shall perish, ye shall die eternally.
Sing, O hell, and rejoice, ye that are under the earth! For God, even the mighty
God, hath spoken, and devoted to death thousands of souls, form the rising of
the sun unto the going down thereof! Here, O death, is they sting! They shall
not, cannot escape; for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it. Here, O grave is
thy victory Nations yet unborn, or ever they have done good or evil are doomed
never to see the light of life, but thou shalt gnaw upon them for ever and ever!
Let all those morning stars sing together, who fell with Lucifer, son of the
morning! Let all the sons of hell shout for joy! For the decree is past, and who
shall disannul it?”
29. Yea, the decree is past; and so it was before the
foundation of the world. But what decree? Even this: “I will set before the sons
of men ‘life and death, blessing cursing.’ And the soul that chooseth life shall
live, as the soul that chooseth death shall die.” This decree whereby “whom God
did foreknow, he did predestinate,” was indeed from everlasting; this, whereby
all who suffer Christ to make them alive are “elect according to the
foreknowledge of God,” now standeth fast, even as the moon, and as the faithful
witnesses in heaven; and when heaven and earth shall pass away, yet this shall
not pass away; for it is as unchangeable and eternal as is the being of God that
gave it. This decree yields the strongest encouragement to abound in all good
works and in all holiness; and it is a well-spring of joy, of happiness also, to
our great and endless comfort. This is worthy of God; it is every way consistent
with all the perfections of his nature. It gives us the noblest view both of his
justice, mercy, and truth. To this agrees the whole scope of the Christian
Revelation, as well as all the parts thereof. To this Moses and all the Prophets
bear witness, and our blessed Lord and all his Apostles Thus Moses, in the name
of his Lord: “I call heaven and earth to record against you this day, that I
have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life,
that thou and thy seed may live.” Thus Ezekiel: choose life, that thou and thy
seed may live;“Thus Ezekiel: (To cite one Prophet for all:) “The soul that
sinneth, it shall die: The son shall not bear” eternally, “the iniquity of the
father. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness
of the wicked shall be upon him.” (18:20.) Thus our blessed Lord: “If any man
thirst, let him come unto me and drink.” (John
7:37.) Thus his great Apostle, St. Paul: (Acts
17:30:) “God commandeth all men everywhere to repent; — “all men
everywhere;” every man in every place, without any exception either of place or
person. Thus St. James: “If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, who
giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not, and it shall be given him.”
(James 1:5.) Thus St. Peter: (2 Pet. 3:9:) “The Lord is not willing that any
should perish, but that all should come to repentance.” And thus St. John: “If
any man sin, we have an Advocate with the Father; and he is the propitiation for
our sins; and not for ours only, but for the sins of the whole world.”
(1 John 2:1, 2.)
30. O hear ye this, ye that forget God! Ye cannot charge your
death upon him! “‘Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die?’ saith
the Lord God.” (Ezek. 18:23ff.) “Repent,
and turn from all your transgressions; so iniquity shall not be your ruin. Cast
away from you all your transgressions where by ye have transgressed, — for why
will ye die, O house of Israel? For I have no pleasure in the death of him that
dieth, saith the Lord God. Wherefore turn yourselves, and live ye.” “As I live,
saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked. — Turn ye,
turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?” (Ezekiel 33:11.)