| 
			 THE REASONABLENESS OF TRUE 
			RELIGION 
			Mic 6:1-8 
			WE have now reached a passage from which all 
			obscurities of date and authorship disappear before the transparence 
			and splendor of its contents. "These few verses," says a great 
			critic, "in which Micah sets forth the true essence of religion, may 
			raise a well-founded title to be counted as the most important in 
			the prophetic literature. Like almost no others, they afford us an 
			insight into the innermost nature of the religion of Israel, as 
			delivered by the prophets." 
			 
			Usually it is only the last of the verses upon which the admiration 
			of the reader is bestowed: "What doth the Lord require of thee, O 
			man, but to do justice and love mercy and walk humbly with thy God?" 
			But in truth the rest of the passage differeth not in glory; the 
			wonder of it lies no more in its peroration than in its argument as 
			a whole. 
			 
			The passage is cast in the same form as the opening chapter of the 
			book-that of the Argument or Debate between the God of Israel and 
			His people, upon the great theatre of Nature. The heart must be dull 
			that does not leap to the Presences before which the trial is 
			enacted. 
			 
			The prophet speaks:- 
			 
			"Hear ye now that which Jehovah is saying; Arise, contend before the 
			mountains, And let the hills hear thy voice! Hear, O mountains, the 
			Lord’s Argument, And ye, the everlasting foundations of earth!" 
			 
			This is not mere scenery. In all the moral questions between God and 
			man, the prophets feel that Nature is involved. Either she is called 
			as a witness to the long history of their relations to each other, 
			or as sharing God’s feeling off the intolerableness of the evil 
			which men have heaped upon her, or by her droughts and floods and 
			earthquakes as the executioner of their doom. It is in the first of 
			these capacities that the prophet in this passage appeals to the 
			mountains and eternal foundations of earth. They are called, not 
			because they are the biggest of existences, but because they are the 
			most full of memories and associations with both parties to the 
			Trial. 
			 
			The main idea of the passage, however, is the trial itself. We have 
			seen more than once that the forms of religion which the prophets 
			had to combat were those which expressed it mechanically in the form 
			of ritual and sacrifice, and those which expressed it in mere 
			enthusiasm and ecstasy. Between such extremes the prophets insisted 
			that religion was knowledge and that it was conduct rational 
			intercourse and loving duty between God and man. This is what they 
			figure in their favorite scene of a Debate which is now before us. 
			 
			"Jehovah hath a Quarrel with His People, And with Israel He cometh 
			to argue." 
			 
			To us, accustomed to communion with the Godhead, as with a Father, 
			this may seem formal and legal. But if we so regard it we do it an 
			injustice. The form sprang by revolt against mechanical and 
			sensational ideas of religion. It emphasized religion as rational 
			and moral, and at once preserved the reasonableness of God and the 
			freedom of man. God spoke with the people whom He had educated: He 
			plead with them, listened to their statements and questions, and 
			produced His own evidences and reasons. Religion-such a passage as 
			this asserts-religion is not a thing of authority nor of ceremonial 
			nor of mere feeling, but of argument, reasonable presentation and 
			debate. Reason is not put out of court: man’s freedom is respected; 
			and he is not taken by surprise through his fears or his feelings. 
			This sublime and generous conception of religion, which we owe first 
			of all to the prophets in their contest with superstitious and 
			slothful theories off religion that unhappily survive among us, was 
			carried to its climax in the Old Testament by another class of 
			writers. We find it elaborated with great power and beauty in the 
			Books of Wisdom. In these the Divine Reason has emerged from the 
			legal forms now before us, and has become the Associate and Friend 
			off Man. The Prologue to the Book of Proverbs tells how Wisdom, 
			fellow of God from the foundation of the world, descends to dwell 
			among men. She comes forth into their streets and markets, she 
			argues and pleads there with an urgency which is equal to the 
			urgency of temptation itself. But it ‘is not all the earthly 
			ministry of the Son of God, His arguments with the doctors, His 
			parables to the common people, His gentle and prolonged education of 
			His disciples, that we see the reasonableness of religion in all its 
			strength and beauty. 
			 
			In that free court of reason in which the prophets saw God and man 
			plead together, the subjects were such as became them both. For God 
			unfolds no mysteries, and pleads no power, but the debate proceeds 
			upon the facts and evidences of life: the appearance of character in 
			history; whether the past be not full of the efforts of love; 
			whether God had not, as human willfulness permitted Him, achieved 
			the liberation and progress of His people. 
			 
			God speaks:- 
			 
			"My people, what have I done unto thee? And how have I wearied 
			thee-answer Me! For I brought thee up from the land of Misraim, And 
			from the house of slavery I redeemed thee. I sent before thee Moses, 
			Aharon and Miriam. My people, remember now what Balak king of Moab 
			counseled, And how he was answered by Bala’am, Beors son-So that 
			thou mayest know the righteous deeds of Jehovah." 
			 
			Always do the prophets go back to Egypt or the wilderness. There God 
			made the people, there He redeemed them. In law book as in prophecy, 
			it is the fact of redemption which forms the main ground of His 
			appeal. Redeemed by Him, the people are not their own, but His. 
			Treated with that wonderful love and patience, like patience and 
			love they are called to bestow upon the weak and miserable beneath 
			them. One of the greatest interpreters of the prophets to our own 
			age, Frederick Denison Maurice, has said upon this passage:  
			 
			"We do not know God till we recognize Him as a Deliverer; we do not 
			understand our own work in the world till we believe we are sent 
			into it to carry out His designs for the deliverance of ourselves 
			and the race. The bondage I groan under is a bondage of the will. 
			God is emphatically the Redeemer of the Will. It is in Chat 
			character He reveals Himself to us. We could not think of God at all 
			as the God, the living God, if we did not regard Him as such a 
			Redeemer. But if of my will, then of all wills: sooner or later I am 
			convinced He Will be manifested as the Restorer, Regenerator-not of 
			something else, but of this roof the fallen spirit that is within 
			us." 
			 
			In most of the controversies which the prophets open between God and 
			man, the subject on the side of the latter is his sin. But that is 
			not so here. In the controversy which opens the Book of Micah the 
			argument falls upon the transgressions of the people, but here upon 
			their sincere though mistaken methods of approaching God. There God 
			deals with dull consciences, but here with darkened and imploring 
			hearts. In that case we had rebels forsaking the true God for idols, 
			but here are earnest seekers after God, who have lost their way and 
			are weary. Accordingly, as indignation prevailed there, here 
			prevails pity; and though formally this be a controversy under the 
			same legal form as before, the passage breathes tenderness and 
			gentleness from first to last. By this as well as by the 
			recollections of the ancient history of Israel we are reminded of 
			the style of Hosea. But there is no expostulation, as in his book, 
			with the people’s continued devotion to ritual. All that is past, 
			and a new temper prevails. Israel have at last come to feel the 
			vanity of the exaggerated zeal with which Amos pictures them 
			exceeding the legal requirements of sacrifice; and with a despair, 
			sufficiently evident in the superlatives which they use, they 
			confess the futility and weariness of the whole system, even in the 
			most lavish and impossible forms of sacrifice. What then remains for 
			them to do? The prophet answers with the beautiful words that 
			express an ideal of religion to which no subsequent century has ever 
			been able to add either grandeur or tenderness. 
			 
			The people speak:- 
			 
			"Wherewithal shall I come before Jehovah, Shall I bow myself to God 
			the Most High? Shall I come before Him with burnt-offerings, With 
			calves of one year? Will Jehovah be pleased with thousands of rams, 
			With myriads of rivers of oil? Shall I give my firstborn for a 
			guilt-offering The fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?" 
			 
			The prophet answers:- 
			 
			"He hath shown thee, O man, what is good; And what is the Lord 
			seeking from thee, But to do justice and love mercy, And humbly to 
			walk with thy God?" 
			 
			This is the greatest saying of the Old Testament; and there is only 
			one other in the New which excels it:- 
			 
			"Come unto Me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will 
			give you rest." 
			 
			"Take My yoke upon you, and learn of Me; for I am meek and lowly in 
			heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls." 
			 
			"For My yoke is easy, and My burden is light." 
  
									 |