|
SACRIFICE OF ISAAC
Genesis 22
THE sacrifice of Isaac was the supreme act of Abraham’s life. The
faith which had been schooled by so singular an experience and by so
many minor trials was here perfected and exhibited as perfect. The
strength which he had been slowly gathering during a long and trying
life was here required and used. This is the act which shines like a
star out of those dark ages, and has served for many storm-tossed
souls over whom God’s billows have gone, as a mark by which they
could still shape their course when all else was dark. The
devotedness which made the sacrifice, the trust in God that endured
when even such a sacrifice was demanded, the justification of this
trust by the event, and the affectionate fatherly acknowledgment
with which God gloried in the man’s loyalty and strength of
character-all so legibly written here-come home to every heart in
the time of its need. Abraham has here shown the way to the highest
reach of human devotedness and to the heartiest submission to the
Divine will in the most heartrending circumstances. Men and women
living our modern life are brought into situations which seem as
torturing and overwhelming as those of Abraham, and all who are in
such conditions find, in his loyal trust in God, sympathetic and
effectual aid.
In order to understand God’s part in this incident and to remove the
suspicion that God imposed upon Abraham as a duty what was really a
crime, or that He was playing with the most sacred feelings of His
servant, there are one or two facts which must not be left out of
consideration. In the first place, Abraham did not think it wrong to
sacrifice his son. His own conscience did not clash with God’s
command. On the contrary, it was through his own conscience God’s
will impressed itself upon him. No man of Abraham’s character and
intelligence could suppose that any word of God could make that
right which was in itself wrong, or would allow the voice of
conscience to be drowned by some mysterious voice from without. If
Abraham had supposed that in all circumstances it was a crime to
take his son’s life, he could not have listened to any voice that
bade him commit this crime. The man who in our day should put his
child to death and plead that he had a Divine warrant for it would
either be hanged or confined as insane. No miracle would be accepted
as a guarantee for the Divine dictation of such an act. No voice
from heaven would be listened to for a moment, if it contradicted
the voice of the universal conscience of mankind. But in Abraham’s
day the universal conscience had only approbation to express for
such a deed as this. Not only had the father absolute power over the
son, so that he might do with him what he pleased; but this
particular mode of disposing of a son would be considered singular
only as being beyond the reach of ordinary virtue. Abraham was
familiar with the idea that the most exalted form of religious
worship was the sacrifice of the first-born. He felt, in common with
godly men in every age, that to offer to God cheap sacrifices while
we retain for ourselves what is truly precious, is a kind of worship
that betrays our low estimate of God rather than expresses true
devotion. He may have been conscious that in losing Ishmael he had
felt resentment against God for depriving him of so loved a
possession; he may have seen Canaanite fathers offering their
children to gods he knew to be utterly unworthy of any sacrifice;
and this may have rankled in his mind until he felt shut up to offer
his all to God in the person of his son, his only son, Isaac. At all
events, however, it became his conviction that God desired him to
offer his son; this was a sacrifice which was in no respect
forbidden by his own conscience.
But although not wrong in Abraham’s judgment, this sacrifice was
wrong in the eye of God; how then can we justify God’s command that
He should make it? We justify it precisely on that ground which lies
patent on the face of the narrative-God meant Abraham to make the
sacrifice in spirit, not in the outward act. He meant to write
deeply on the Jewish mind the fundamental lesson regarding
sacrifice, that it is in the spirit and will all true sacrifice is
made. God intended what actually happened, that Abraham’s sacrifice
should be complete and that human sacrifice should receive a fatal
blow. So far from introducing into Abraham’s mind erroneous ideas
about sacrifice, this incident finally dispelled from his mind such
ideas and permanently fixed in his mind the conviction that the
sacrifice God seeks is the devotion of the living soul, not the
consumption of a dead body. God met him on the platform of knowledge
and of morality to which he had attained, and by requiring him to
sacrifice his son taught him and all his descendants in what sense
alone such sacrifice can be acceptable. God meant Abraham to
sacrifice his son, but not in the coarse material sense. God meant
him to yield the lad truly to Him; to arrive at the consciousness
that Isaac more truly belonged to God than to him, his father. It
was needful that Abraham and Isaac should be in perfect harmony with
the Divine will. Only by being really and absolutely in God’s hand
could they, or can any one, reach the whole and full good designed
for them by God.
How old Isaac was at the time of this sacrifice there is no means of
accurately ascertaining. He was probably in the vigor of early
manhood. He was able to take his share in the work of cutting wood
for the burnt offering and carrying the faggots a considerable
distance. It was necessary too that this sacrifice should be made on
Isaac’s part not with the timorous shrinking or ignorant boldness of
a boy, but with the full comprehension and deliberate consent of
maturer years. It is probable that Abram ham was already preparing,
if not to yield to Isaac the family headship, yet to introduce him
to a share in the responsibilities he had so long borne alone. From
the touching confidence in one another which this incident exhibits,
a light is reflected on the fond intercourse of former years. Isaac
was at that time of life when a son is closest to a father, mature
but not independent; when all that a father can do has been done,
but while as yet the son has not passed away into a life of his own.
And Isaac was no ordinary son. The man of business who has
encouraged and solaced himself in his toil by the hope that his son
will reap the fruit of it and make his old age easy and honoured,
but who outlives his son and sees the effort of his life go for
nothing, the proprietor who bears an ancient name and sees his heir
die-these are familiar objects of pathetic interest, and no heart is
so hard as to refuse a tear of sympathy when brought into view of
such heart-withering bereavements. But in Abraham all fatherly
feelings had been evoked and strengthened and deepened by a quite
peculiar experience. By a special and most effectual discipline he
had been separated from the objects which ordinarily divide men’s
attention and eke out their contentment in life, and his whole hopes
had been compelled to centre in his son. It was not the perpetuation
of a name nor the transmission of a well-known and valuable
property; it was not even the gratification of the most justifiable
and tender of human affections, that was crushed and thwarted in
Abraham by this command; but it was also and especially that hope
which had been aroused and fostered in him by extraordinary
providences and which concerned, as he believed, not himself alone
but all men.
Manifestly no harder task could have been set to Abraham than that
which was imposed on him by the command, "Take now thy son, thine
only son, Isaac, whom thou lovest," this son of thine in whom all
the promises are yea and amen to thee, this son for whose sake thou
gavest up home and kindred, and banished thy firstborn Ishmael, this
son whom thou lovest, and offer him for a burnt-offering. This son,
Abraham might have said, whom I have been taught to cherish, putting
aside all other affections that I might love him above all, I am now
with my own hand to slay, to slay with all the terrible niceties and
formalities of sacrifice and with all the love and adoration of
sacrifice. I am with my own hand to destroy all that makes life
valuable to me, and as I do so I am to love and worship Him who
commands this sacrifice. I am to go to Isaac, whom I have taught to
look forward to the fairest happiest life, and I am to contradict
all I ever told him and tell him now that he has only grown to
maturity that he might be cut down in the flush and hope of opening
manhood. What can Abraham have thought? Possibly the thought would
occur that God was now recalling the great gift He had made. There
is always enough conscience of sin in the purest human heart to
engender self-reproach and fear on the faintest occasion; and when
so signal a token of God’s displeasure as this was sent, Abraham may
well have believed himself to have been unwittingly guilty of some
great crime against God, or have now thought with bitterness of the
languid devotion he had been offering Him. I have in sacrificing a
lamb been as if I had been cutting off a dog’s neck, profane and
thoughtless in my worship, and now God is solemnising me indeed. I
have in thought or desire kept back the prime of my flock, and God
is now teaching me that a man may not rob God. Who could have been
surprised if in this horror of great darkness the mind of Abraham
had become unhinged? Who could wonder if he had slain himself to
make the loss of Isaac impossible? Who could wonder if he had
sullenly ignored the command, waited for further light, or rejected
an alliance with God which involved such lamentable conditions?
Nothing that could befall him in consequence of disobedience, he
might have supposed, could exceed in pain the agony of obedience.
And it is always easier to endure the pain inflicted upon us by
circumstances than to do with our own hand and free will what we
know will involve us in suffering. It is not mere resignation but
active obedience that was required of Abraham. His was not the
passive resignation of the man out of whose reach death or disaster
has swept his dearest treasures, and who is helped to resignation by
the consciousness that no murmuring can bring them back-his was the
far more difficult act of resignation, which has still in possession
all that it prizes, and may withhold these treasures if it pleases,
but is called by a higher voice than that of self-pleasing to
sacrifice them all.
But though Abraham was the chief, he was not the sole actor in this
trying scene. To Isaac this was the memorable day of his life, and
quiescent and passive as his character seems to have been, it cannot
but have been stirred and. strained now in every fibre of it.
Abraham, could not find it in his heart to disclose to his son the
object of the journey; even to the last he kept him unconscious of
the part he was himself to play. Two long days’ journey, days of
intense inward commotion to Abraham, they went northward. On the
third day the servants were left, and father and son went on alone,
unaccompanied and unwitnessed. "So they went," as the narrative
twice over says, "both of them together," but with minds how
differently filled; the fathers heart torn with anguish and
distracted by a thousand thoughts, the son’s mind disengaged,
occupied only with the new scenes and with passing fancies. Nowhere
in the narrative does the completeness of the mastery Abraham had
gained over his natural feelings appear more strikingly than in the
calmness with which he answers Isaac’s question. As they approach
the place of sacrifice Isaac observes the silent and awestruck
demeanour of his father and fears that it may have been through
absence of mind he has neglected to bring the lamb. With a gentle
reverence he ventures to attract Abraham’s attention: "My father";
and he said, "Here am I, my son." And he said, "Behold the fire and
the wood, but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?" It is one of
those moments when only the strongest heart can bear up calmly and
when only the humblest faith has the right word to say. "My son, the
Lord will provide Himself a lamb for a burnt offering."
Not much longer could the terrible truth be hidden from Isaac. With
what feelings must he have seen the agonised face of his father as
he turned to bind him and as he learned that he must prepare not to
sacrifice but to be sacrificed. Here then was the end of those great
hopes on which his youth had been fed. What could such contradiction
mean? Was he to submit even to his father in such a matter? Why
should he not expostulate, resist, flee? Such ideas seem to have
found short entertainment in the mind of Isaac. Trained by long
experience to trust his father, he obeys without complaint or
murmur. Still it cannot cease to be matter of admiration and
astonishment that a young man should have been able on so brief a
notice, through so shocking a way, and with so startling a reversal
of his expectations, to forego all right to choose for himself, and
yield himself implicitly to what he believed to be God’s will. By a
faith so absolute Isaac became indeed the heir of Abraham. When he
laid himself on the altar, trusting his father and his God, he came
of age as the true seed of Abraham and entered on the inheritance,
making God his God. At that supreme moment he made himself over to
God, he put himself at God’s disposal; if his death was to be
helpful in fulfilling God’s purpose he was willing to die. It was
God’s will that must be done, not his. He knew that God could not
err, could not harm His people; he was ignorant of the design which
his death could fulfil, but he felt sure that his sacrifice was not
asked in vain.
He had familiarised himself with the thought that he belonged to
God; that he was on earth for God’s purposes, not for his own; so
that now, when he was suddenly summoned to lay himself formally and
finally on God’s altar, he did not hesitate to do so. He had learned
that there are possessions more worth preserving than life itself,
that
"Manhood is the one immortal thing Beneath Time’s changeful sky"-
he had learned that "length of days is knowing when to die."
No one who has measured the strain that such sacrifice puts upon
human nature can withhold his tribute of cordial admiration for so
rare a devotedness, and no one can fail to see that by this
sacrifice Isaac became truly the heir of Abraham. And not only
Isaac, but every man attains his majority by sacrifice. Only by
losing our life do we begin to live. Only by yielding ourselves
truly and unreservedly to God’s purpose do we enter the true life of
men. The giving up of self, the abandonment of an isolated life, the
bringing of ourselves into connection with God, with the Supreme and
with the whole, this is the second birth. To reach that full stream
of life which is moved by God’s will and which is the true life of
men, we must so give ourselves up to God that each of His
commandments, each of His providences, all by which He comes into
connection with us, has its due effect upon us. If we only seek from
God help to carry out our own conception of life, if we only desire
His power to aid us in making of this life what we have resolved it
shall be, we are far indeed from Isaac’s conception of God and of
life. But if we desire that God fulfil in us, and through us, His
own conception of what our life should be, the only means of
attaining this desire is to put ourselves fairly into God’s hand,
unflinchingly to do what we believe to be His will irrespective of
present darkness and pain and privation. He who thus bids an honest
farewell to earth and lets himself be bound anal laid upon God’s
altar, is conscious that in renouncing himself he has won God and
become His heir.
Have you thus given yourselves to God? I do not ask if your
sacrifice has been perfect, nor whether you do not ever seek great
things still for yourselves: but do you know what it is thus to
yield yourself to God, to put God first, yourself second or nowhere?
Are you even occasionally quite willing to sink your own interests,
your own prospects, your own native tastes, to have your own worldly
hopes delayed or blighted, your future darkened? Have you even
brought your intellect to bear upon this first law of human life,
and determined for yourself whether it is the case or not that man’s
life, in order to be profitable, joyful, and abiding, must be lived
in God? Do you recognise that human life is not for the individual’s
good, but for the common good, and that only in God can each man
find his place and his work? All that we give up to Him we have in
an ampler form. The very affections which we are called to sacrifice
are purified and deepened rather than lost. When Abraham resigned
his son to God and received him back their love took on a new
delicacy and tenderness. They were more than ever to one another
after this interference of God. And He meant it to be so. Where our
affections are thwarted or where our hopes are blasted, it is not
our injury, but our good, that is meant; a fineness and purity, an
eternal significance and depth, are imparted to affections that are
annealed by passing through the fire of trial.
Not till the last moment did God interpose with the gladdening
words, "Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou anything
unto him; for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not
withheld thy son, thine only son, from Me." The significance of this
was so obvious that it passed into a proverb: "In the mount of the
Lord it shall be provided." It was there, and not at any earlier
point, Abraham saw the provision that had been made for an offering.
Up to the moment when he lifted the knife over all he lived for, it
was not seen that other provision was made. Up to the moment when it
was indubitable that both he and Isaac were obedient unto death, and
when in will and feeling they had sacrificed themselves, no
substitute was visible, but no sooner was the sacrifice complete in
spirit than God’s provision was disclosed. It was the spirit of
sacrifice, not the blood of Isaac, that God desired. It was the
noble generosity of Abraham that God delighted in, not the fatherly
grief that would have followed the actual death of Isaac. It was the
heroic submission of father and son that God saw with delight,
rejoicing that men were found capable of the utmost of heroism, of
patient and unflinching adherence to duty. At any point short of the
consummation, interposition would have come too soon, and would have
prevented this educative and elevating display of the capacity of
men for the utmost that life can require of them. Had the provision
of God been made known one minute before the hand of Abraham was
raised to strike, it would have remained doubtful whether in the
critical moment one or other of the parties might not have failed.
But when the sacrifice was complete, when already the bitterness of
death was past, when all the agonizing conflict was over, the
anguish of the father mastered, and the dismay of the son subdued to
perfect conformity with the supreme will, then the full reward of
victorious conflict was given, and God’s meaning flashed through the
darkness, and His provision was seen.
This is the universal law. We find God’s provision only on the mount
of sacrifice, not at any stage short of this, but only there. We
must go the whole way in faith; what lies before us as duty, we must
do; often in darkness and utter misery, seeing no possibility of
escape or relief, we must climb the hill where we are to abandon all
that has given joy and hope to our life; and not before the
sacrifice has been actually made can we enter into the heaven of
victory God provides. You may be called to sacrifice your youth,
your hopes of a career, your affections, that you may uphold and
soothe the lingering days of one to whom you are naturally bound. Or
your whole life may have centred in an affection which circumstances
demand you shall abandon: you may have to sacrifice your natural
tastes and give up almost everything you once set your heart on; and
while to others the years bring brightness and variety and scope, to
you they may be bringing only monotonous fulfilment of insipid and
uncongenial tasks. You may be in circumstances which tempt you to
say, Does God see the inextricable difficulty I am in? Does He
estimate the pain I must suffer if immediate relief do not come? Is
obedience to Him only to involve me in misery from which other men
are exempt? You may even say that although a substitute was found
for Isaac, no substitute has been found for the sacrifice you have
had to make, but you have been compelled actually to lose what was
dear to you as life itself. But when the character has been fully
tried, when the utmost good to character has been accomplished, and
when delay of relief would only increase misery, then relief comes.
Still the law holds good, that as soon as you in spirit yield to
God’s will, and with a quiet submissiveness consent to the loss or
pain inflicted upon you, in that hour your whole attitude to your
circumstances is transformed, you find rest and assured hope. Two
things are certain: that, however painful your condition is, God’s
intention is not to injure, but to advance you, and that hopeful
submission is wiser, nobler, and every way better than murmuring and
resentment.
Finally, these words, "The Lord will provide," which Abraham uttered
in that exalted frame of mind which is near to the prophetic
ecstasy, have been the burden sung by every sincere and thoughtful
worshipper as he ascended the hill of God to seek forgiveness of his
sin, the burden which the Lord’s worshipping congregation kept on
its tongue through all the ages, till at length, as the angel of the
Lord had opened the eyes of Abraham to see the ram provided, the
voice of the Baptist "crying in the wilderness" to a fainting and
well-nigh despairing few turned their eye to God’s great provision
with the final announcement, "Behold the Lamb of God." Let us accept
this as a motto which we may apply, not only in all temporal
straits, when we can see no escape from loss and misery, but also in
all spiritual emergency, when sin seems a burden too great for us to
bear, and when we seem to lib under the uplifted knife of God’s
judgment. Let us remember that God’s desire is not that we suffer
pain, but that we learn obedience, that we be brought to that true
and thorough confidence in Him which may fit us to fulfil His loving
purposes. Let us, above all, remember that we cannot know the grace
of God, cannot experience the abundant provision He has made for
weak and sinful men, until we have climbed the mount of sacrifice
and are able to commit ourselves wholly to Him. Not by attacking our
manifold enemies one by one, nor by attempting the great work of
sanctification piecemeal, shall we ever make much growth or
progress, but by giving ourselves up wholly to God and by becoming
willing to live in Him and as His.
|