|
THE SPIRITUAL BODY
THE proofs of the Resurrection which Paul has adduced are
satisfactory. So long as they are clearly before the mind, we find
it
possible to believe in that great experience which will finally give
us possession of the life to come. But after all proof rises doubt
irrepressible, owing to the difficulty of understanding the process
through which the body passes and the nature of the body that is to
be. "Some man will say, How are the dead raised up? and with what
body do they come?" Not always in an unbelieving and scoffing
spirit; often in mere perplexity and justifiable inquisitiveness,
will men ask these questions.
Paul answers both inquiries by referring to analogies in the natural
world. Only by death, he says, does seed reach its designed
development; and the body or form in which seed rises is very
different in appearance from that in which it is sown. These
analogies have their place and their use in removing objections and
difficulties. They are not intended or supposed to establish the
fact
of the Resurrection, but only to remove difficulties as to its mode.
By analogy you can show that a certain process or result is not
impossible, you may even create a presumption in its favour, but you
cannot establish it as an actuality. Analogy is a powerful
instrument
for removing objections, but utterly weak for establishing positive
truth. Seed lives again after burial, but it does not follow that
our
bodies will do so. Seed, when it rots away beneath the soil, gives
birth to a better thing than that which was sown, but this is no
proof that the same result will follow when our bodies pass through
a
similar treatment. But if a man says, as Paul here supposes he may,
"Such a thing as this resurrection you speak of is an unnatural,
unheard of, and impossible thing, the best reply is to point him to
some analogous process in nature, in which this apparent
impossibility or something very similar is actually brought to
pass."
Even outside the circle of Christian thought these analogies in
nature have always been felt to remove some of the presumptions
against the Resurrection and to make room for listening to evidence
in its favour. The transformation of the seed into the plant and the
development of the seed to a fuller life through apparent
extinction,
the transformation of the grub into the brilliant and powerful
dragonfly through a process which terminates the life of the
grub—these and other natural facts show that one life may be
continued through various phases, and that the termination of one
form of life does not always moan the termination of all life in a
creature. We need not, these analogies tell us, at once conclude
that
death ends all, for in some visible instances death is only a birth
to a higher and freer life. Neither need we point to the dissolution
of the natural body and conclude that no more perfect body can be
connected with such a process, because in many cases we see a more
efficient body disengaged from the original and dissolving body.
Thus
far the analogies carry us. It is doubtful whether they should be
pushed further, although they might seem to indicate that the new
body is not to be a new creation, but is to be produced by virtue of
what is already in existence. The new body is not to be irrespective
of what has gone before, but is to be the natural result of causes
already working. What these causes are, or how the spirit is to
impress its character on the body, we do not know.
It is not impossible, then, nor even quite improbable, that the
death
of our present body may set free a new and far more perfectly
equipped body. The fact that we cannot conceive the nature of this
body need not trouble us. Who without previous observation could
imagine what would spring from an acorn or a seed of wheat? To each
God gives its own body. We cannot imagine what our future body;
subject to no waste or decay, can be; but we need not on that
account
reject as childish all expectation that such a body shall exist.
"All flesh is not the same flesh." The kind of flesh you now wear
may be unfit for everlasting life, but there may await you as
suitable and congenial a body as your present familiar tenement.
Consider the inexhaustible fertility of God, the endless varieties
already existing in nature. The bird has a body which fits it for
life in the air; the fish lives with comfort in its own element. And
the variety already existing does not exhaust God’s resources. We
read at present but one chapter in the history of life, and what
future chapters are to unfold who can imagine? A fertile and
inventive man knows no bounds to his progress; will God stand still?
Are we not but at the beginning of His works? May we not reasonably
suppose that a truly infinite expansion and development await God’s
works? Is it not entirely unreasonable to suppose that what we see
and know is the measure of God’s resources?
Paul does not attempt to describe the future body, but contents
himself with pointing out one or two of its characteristics by which
it is distinguished from the body we now wear. "It is sown in
corruption; it is raised in incorruption: it is sown in dishonour;
it
is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power:
it
is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body." In this body
there are decay, humiliation, weakness, a life that is merely
temporary; in the body that is to be decay gives place to
incorruptibility, humiliation to glory, weakness to power, animal
life to spiritual.
The present body is subject to decay. Not only is it easily injured
by accident and often rendered permanently useless, but it is so
constituted that all activity wastes it; and this waste needs
constant repair. That we may constantly seek this repair, we are
endowed with strong appetites, which sometimes overbear everything
else in us and both defeat their own ends and hinder the growth of
the spirit. The organs by which the waste is repaired themselves
wear
out, so that by no care or nourishment can a man make out to live as
long as a tree. But the very decay of this body makes way for one in
which there shall be no waste, no need of physical nourishment, and
therefore no need of strong and overbearing physical appetites.
Instead of impeding the spirit by clamouring to have its wants
attended to, it will be the spirit’s instrument. A great part of the
temptations of this present life arise from the conditions in which
we necessarily exist as dependent for our comfort in great measure
on
the body. And one can scarcely conceive the feeling of emancipation
and superiority which will possess those who have no anxiety about a
livelihood, no fear of death, no distraction of appetite.
The present body is for similar reasons characterised by
"weakness." We cannot be—where we would, nor do what we would. A
man may work his twelve hours, but he must then acknowledge he has a
body which needs rest and sleep. Many persons are disqualified by
bodily weakness from certain forms of usefulness and enjoyment. Many
persons also, though able to do a certain amount of work, do it with
labour; their vitality is habitually low, and they never have the
full use of their powers, but need continually to be on their guard,
and go through life burdened with a lassitude and discomfort more
difficult to bear than passing attacks of pain. In contradistinction
to this and to every form of weakness, the resurrection body will be
full of power, able to accomplish the behests of the will, and fit
for all that is required of it.
But the most comprehensive contrast between the two bodies is
expressed in the words, "It is sown a natural body; it is raised a
spiritual body." A natural body is that which is animated by a human
life and is fitted for this world. "The first man Adam was made a
living soul," or, as we should more naturally say, an animal. He was
made with a capacity for living; and because he was to live upon
earth, he had a body in which this life or soul was lodged. The
natural body is the body we receive at birth, and which is suited
for
its own requirements of maintaining itself in life in this world
into
which we are born. The soul, or animal life, of man is higher than
that of the other animals, it has richer endowments and capacities,
but it is also in, many respects similar. Many men are quite content
with the merely animal life which this world upholds and furnishes.
They find enough to satisfy them in its pleasures, its work, its
affairs, its friendships; and for all these the natural body is
sufficient. The thoughtful man cannot indeed but look forward and
ask
himself what is to become of this body. If he turns to Scripture for
light, he will probably be struck with the fact that it sheds no
light whatever on the future of the natural body. Those who are in
Christ enter into possession of a spiritual body, but there is no
hint of any more perfect body being prepared for those who are not
in
Christ.
The spiritual body which is reserved for spiritual men, is a body in
which the upholding life is spiritual. The natural life of man both
forms to a human shape, and upholds, the natural body; the spiritual
body is similarly maintained by what is spiritual in man. It is the
soul, or natural life, of man which gives the body its appetites and
maintains it in efficiency; remove this soul, and the body is mere
dead matter. In like manner it is the spirit which maintains the
spiritual body; and by the spirit is meant that in man which can
delight in God and in goodness. The body we now have is miserable
and
useless or happy and serviceable in proportion to its animal
vitality, in proportion to its power to assimilate to itself the
nutriment this physical world supplies. The spiritual body will be
healthy or sickly in proportion to the spiritual vitality that
animates it; that is to say, in proportion to the power of the
individual spirit to delight in God and find its life in Him and in
what He lives for.
We have already seen that Paul refuses to consider the resurrection
of Christ as miraculous in the sense of its being unique or
abnormal;
on the contrary, he considers resurrection to be an essential step
in
normal human development, and therefore experienced by Christ. And
now he enunciates the great principle or law which governs not only
this fact of resurrection, but the whole evolution of God’s works:
"first that which is natural, afterward that which is spiritual."
It is this law which we see ruling the history of creation and the
history of man. The spiritual is the culminating point towards which
all of the processes of nature tend. The gradual development of what
is spiritual—of will, of love, of moral excellence—this, so far as
man can see, is the end towards which all nature constantly and
steadily is working.
Sometimes, however, it occurs to one to question the law "first that
which is natural, afterward that which is spiritual." If the present
body hinders rather than helps the growth of the spirit, if at last
all Christians are to have a spiritual body, why might we not have
had this body to begin with? What need of this mysterious process of
passing from life to life and from body to body? If it is true that
we are here only for a few years and in the future life forever, why
should we be here at all? Why might we not at birth have been
ushered
into our eternal state? The answer is obvious. We are not at once
introduced into our eternal condition because we are moral
creatures,
free to choose for ourselves, and who cannot enter an eternal state
save by choice of our own: first that which is natural, first that
which is animal, first a life in which we have abundant opportunity
to test what appears good and are free to make our choice; then that
which is spiritual, because the spiritual can only be a thing of
choice, a thing of the will. There is no spiritual life or spiritual
birth save by the will. Men can become spiritual only by choosing to
be so. Involuntary, compulsory, necessitated, natural spirituality
is, so far as man is concerned, a contradiction in terms.
Human nature is a thing of immense possibilities and range. On the
one side it is akin to the lower animals, to the physical world and
all that is in it, high and low; on the other side it is akin to the
highest of all spiritual existences, even to God Himself. At present
we are in a world admirably adapted for our probation and
discipline,
a world in which, in point of fact, every man does attach himself to
the lower or to the higher, to the present or to the eternal, to the
natural or to the spiritual. And although the results of this may
not
be apparent in average cases, yet in extreme cases the results of
human choice are obtrusively apparent. Let a man give himself
unrestrainedly and exclusively to animal life in its grosser forms,
and the body itself soon begins to suffer. You can see the process
of
physical deterioration going on, deepening in misery until death
comes. But what follows death? Can one promise himself or another a
future body which shall be exempt from the pains which unrepented
sin
has introduced? Are those who have by their vice committed a slow
suicide to be clothed here after in an incorruptible and efficient
body? It seems wholly contrary to reason to suppose so. And how can
their probation be continued if the very circumstance which makes
this life so thorough a probation to us all—the circumstance of our
being clothed with a body—is absent? The truth is, there is no
subject on which more darkness hangs or on which Scripture preserves
so ominous a silence as the future of the body of those who in this
life have not chosen God and things spiritual as their life.
On the other hand, if we consider instances in which the spiritual
life has been resolutely and unreservedly chosen, we see
anticipations here also of the future destiny of those who have so
chosen. They may be crushed by diseases as painful and as fatal as
the most flagrant of sinners endure, but these diseases frequently
have the result only of making the true spiritual life shine more
brightly. In extreme cases, you would almost say, the transmutation
of the tortured and worn body into a glorified body is begun. The
spirit seems dominant; and as you stand by and watch, you begin to
feel that death has no relation to the emotions, and hopes, and
intercourse you detect in that spirit. These which seem, and are,
the
very life of the spirit, cannot be thought of as terminated by a
merely physical change. They do not spring from, nor do they depend
upon, what is physical; and it is reasonable to suppose that they
will not be destroyed by it. Looking at Christ Himself and allowing
due impression to be made upon us by His concernment about the
highest, and best, and most lasting things, by His recognition of
God
and harmony with Him, by His living in God, and by His superiority
to
earthly considerations, we cannot but feel it to be most unlikely
that such a spirit should be extinguished by bodily death.
This spiritual body we receive through the intervention of Christ.
As
from the first man we receive animal life, from the second we
receive
spiritual life. "The first Adam was made a living soul, the last
Adam a quickening spirit. And as we have borne the image of the
earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly." The image of
the first man we have by our natural and physical derivation from
him, the image of the second by spiritual derivation; that is to
say,
by our choosing Christ as our ideal and by our allowing His Spirit
to
form us. This Spirit is life giving; this Spirit is indeed God,
communicating to us a life which is at once holy and eternal.
The mode of Christ’s intervention is more fully described in the
words, "The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the
law. But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our
Lord Jesus Christ." Everywhere Paul teaches that it was sin which
brought death upon man; that man would have broken through the law
of
death which reigns in the physical world had he not by sin brought
himself under the power of things physical. And this poisonous fang
was pressed in by the Law. The strength of sin is the Law. It is
positive disobedience, the preference of known evil to known good,
the violation of law whether written in the conscience or in spoken
commandments, which gives sin its moral character. The choice of the
evil in presence of the good—it is that which constitutes sin.
The words are no doubt susceptible of another meaning. They could be
used by one who wished to say that sin is that which makes death
painful, which adds terror of future judgment and gloomy forebodings
to the natural pain of death. But it must be owned that this is not
so much in keeping with Paul’s usual way of looking at the
connection
between death and sin.
Christ’s victory over death is thus explained by Godet: "Christ’s
victory over death has two aspects, the one relating to Himself, the
other concerning men. He first of all conquered sin in relation
to Himself by denying to it the right of existence in Him,
condemning
it to nonexistence in His flesh, similar though it was to our sinful
flesh; {Ro 8:3} and thereby He disarmed the Law so far as it
concerned Himself. His life being the Law in living realisation, He
had it for Him, and not against Him. This twofold personal victory
was the foundation of His own resurrection. Thereafter He continued
to act that this victory might extend to us. And first He freed us
from the burden of condemnation which the Law laid on us, and
whereby it was ever interposing between us and communion with God.
He
recognised in our name the right of God over the sinner; He
consented
to satisfy it to the utmost in His own person. Whoever appropriates
this death as undergone in his room and stead and for himself, sees
the door of reconciliation to God open before him, as if he had
himself expiated all his sins. The separation established by the Law
no longer exists; the Law is disarmed. By that very fact sin
also
is vanquished. Reconciled to God, the believer receives Christ’s
Spirit, who works in him an absolute breach of will with sin and
complete devotion to God. The yoke of sin is at an end; the dominion
of God is restored in the heart. The two foundations of the reign of
death are thus destroyed. Let Christ appear, and this reign will
crumble in the dust forever."
It is then with joy and triumph Paul contemplates death. Naturally
we
shrink from and fear it. We know it only from one side: only from
seeing it in the persons of other men, and not from our own
experience. And what we see in others is necessarily only the darker
side of death, the cessation of bodily life and of all intercourse
with the warm and lively interests of the world. It is a condition
exciting tears, and moaning, and grief in those that remain in life;
and though these tears arise chiefly from our own sense of loss, yet
insensibly we think of the condition of the dead as a state to be
bewailed. We see the sowing in weakness, in dishonour, in
corruption,
as Paul says; and we do not see the glory, and strength, and
incorruption of the spiritual body. The dead may be in bright
regions
and be living a keener life than ever; but of this we see nothing:
and all we do see is sad, depressing, humiliating.
But to "faith’s foreseeing eye" the other side of death becomes
also apparent. The grave becomes the robing room for life eternal.
Stripped of "this muddy vesture of decay," we are there to be
clothed with a spiritual body. Death is enlisted in the service of
Christ’s people; and by destroying flesh and blood, it enables this
mortal to put on immortality. The blow which threatens to crush and
annihilate all life breaks but the shell and lets the imprisoned
spirit free to a larger life. Death is swallowed up in victory, and
itself ministers to the final triumph of man. Our instincts tell us
that death is critical and has a determining power on our destinies.
We cannot evade it; we may depreciate or neglect, but we cannot
diminish, its importance. It has its place and its function, and it
will operate in each one of us according to what it finds in us,
destroying what is merely animal, emancipating what is truly
spiritual. We cannot as yet stand on the further side of death, and
look back on it, and recognise its kindly work in us; but we can
understand Paul’s burst of anticipated triumph, and with him we can
forecast the joy of having passed all doubtful struggle and anxious
foreboding, and of finally experiencing that all the evils of
humanity have been overcome. With a triumph so complete in view, we
can also listen to his exhortation, "Therefore, my beloved brethren,
be ye steadfast, unmovable, always abounding in the work of the
Lord,
forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord."
But if we have any fit conception of the magnitude of the triumph,
we
shall also cherish some worthy idea of the reality of the conflict.
Those who have felt the terror of death know that it can be
counterbalanced only by something more than a surmise, a hope, a
longing, only indeed by a fact as solid as itself. And if to them
the
resurrection of Christ approves itself as such a fact, and if they
can listen to His voice saying, "Because I live, ye shall live
also," they do feel themselves armed against the graver terrors of
death, and cannot but look forward with some confident hope to a
life
into which the ills they have here experienced cannot follow them.
But at the same time, and in proportion as the reality of the future
life quickens hope within them, it must also reveal to them the
reality of the conflict through which that life is reached. By no
mere idle naming of the name of Christ or resultless faith in Him
can
men pass from what is natural to what is spiritual. We are summoned
to believe in Christ, but for a purpose; and that purpose is that,
believing in Him as the revelation of God to us, we may be able to
choose Him as our pattern and live His life. It is only what is
purely spiritual in ourselves that can put us in possession of a
spiritual body. From Christ we can receive what is spiritual; and if
our belief in Him prompts us to become like Him, then we may count
upon sharing in His destiny.
This is the permanent incentive of the Christian life. This present
experience of ours leads to a larger, more satisfying experience.
Beyond our horizon there awaits us an endlessly enlarging world.
Death, which seems to bound our view, is really but our real birth
to
a fuller, and eternal, and true life. "Therefore be ye steadfast,
unmovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord." The promptings
of conscience do not delude you; your instinctive hopes will not be
put to shame; your faith is reasonable; there is a life beyond. And
no effort you now put forth will prove vain; no prayer, no earnest
desire, no struggle towards what is spiritual, will fail of its
effect. All that is spiritual is destined to live; it belongs to the
eternal world: and all that you do in the Spirit, all mastery of
self
and the world and the flesh, all devoted fellowship with God—all is
giving you a surer place and a more abundant entrance into the
spiritual world, for "your labour is not in vain in the Lord."
|