| By :
        W.
        Max
        Muller  
        Kaufmann
        Kohler   
 
        
        Derivation and Relationship.
 —Biblical Data:
 
        A nation in eastern Palestine. As to their origin from Lot, 
		compare Gen. xix. 38, in which "Ben-ammi" (son of my paternal uncle; 
		that is, of my nearest relative) is paro-nomasia, not etymology. It is 
		possible that Ammon is derived from the name of a tribal divinity.
         
        According to the pedigree given in Gen. xix. 37-38, the 
		Ammonites were nearly related to the Israelites and still more closely 
		to their neighbors in the south, the Moabites. This is fully confirmed 
		by the fact that all names of Ammonitish persons show a pure Canaanitish 
		character. But the above passage indicates also the contempt and hatred 
		for the Ammonites felt by the Hebrews (Deut. xxiii. 4), even to the 
		exclusion of their progeny from the assembly of the Lord (contrast Deut. 
		ii. 19, 37, in which the consciousness of relationship seems to be at 
		the root of the regard shown to Ammon).  
        The borders of the Ammonite territory are not clearly defined 
		in the Bible. In Judges, xi. 13, the claim of the king of Ammon, who 
		demands of the Israelites the restoration of the land "from Arnon even 
		unto Jabbok and unto Jordan," is mentioned only as an unjust claim (xi. 
		15), inasmuch as the Israelitish part of this tract had been conquered 
		from the Amorites whom the Moabites had, in part, preceded; while in 
		Judges, xi. 22 it is stated that the Israelites had possession "from the 
		wilderness even unto Jordan," and that they laid a claim to territory 
		beyond this, so as to leave no room for Ammon. Num. xxi. 24 describes 
		the Hebrew conquest (compare Judges, xi. 19) as having reached "even 
		unto the children of Ammon, for the border of the children of Ammon was 
		Jazer" (read the last word, with Septuagint, as "Jazer," instead of 
		"'az," strong, A. V.; compare Judges, xi. 32). Josh. xiii. 25, defines 
		the frontier of the tribe of Gad as being "Jazer . . . and half the land 
		of the children of Ammon." The latter statement can be reconciled with 
		Num. xxi. 24 (Deut. ii. 19, 37) only by assuming that the northern part 
		of Sihon's Amorite kingdom had for merly been Ammonite. This explains, 
		in part, the claim mentioned above (Judges, xi. 13). According to Deut. 
		ii. 37, the region along the river Jabbok and the cities of the 
		hill-country formed the border-line of Israel.  
        In Judges, xi. 33, a portion of the land of Ammon is 
		mentioned. It extended from Aroer to Minnith, including twenty cities, 
		and must have been anextremely 
		narrow strip of land, comprising only the northeastern quarter of the 
		region called, at present, El-Belka. According to the Moabite stone, the 
		southeastern quarter, attributed by many scholars to Ammon, could not 
		have belonged to it; and nothing is known concerning an extension north 
		of the Jabbok river. The village of the Ammonites (or according to the
        Ḳeri, Ammonitess), Josh. xviii. 24, in Benjamin, does not point 
		to former possessions west of Jordan. On the authority of Deut. ii. 20, 
		their territory had formerly been in the possession of a mysterious 
		nation, the
        Zamzummim (also called Zuzim), and the war of Chedorlaomer 
		(Gen. xiv. 5) with these may be connected with the history of Ammon. 
		When the Israelites invaded Canaan, they passed by the frontier of the 
		Ammonites (Num. xxi. 24; Deut. ii. 19, 37; Josh. xiii. 25).
         
        
        Ammonites and Moabites.
         
        Sometimes a slight distinction only seems to be made between 
		the Ammonites and their southern brothers, the Moabites. Deut. xxiii. 4, 
		5, for instance, states that the Ammonites and Moabites hired Balaam to 
		curse the Israelites, while in Num. xxii. 3 et seq. Moab alone is 
		mentioned. Some authorities overcome this discrepancy by the help of the 
		emended text of Num. xxii. 5, according to which Balaam came "from the 
		land of the children of Ammon." This is the reading of most ancient 
		versions; the Septuagint, however, has it like the present Hebrew text: 
		"the children of his people" ("ammo") (see
        Balaam). In Judges, iii. 13, the Ammonites 
		appear as furnishing assistance to Eglon of Moab against Israel; but in 
		Judges, x. 7, 8, 9, in which not only Gilead is oppressed but a 
		victorious war is waged also west of the Jordan, Ammon alone is 
		mentioned. The speech of Jephthah which follows, however, is clearly 
		addressed to the Moabites as well, for he speaks of their god Chemosh 
		(Judges, xi. 18-24). Some scholars find that these varying statements 
		conflict (compare Deut. xxiii. 3); others conclude that the 
		brother-nations still formed a unit. The small nation of Ammon could 
		face Israel only in alliance with other non-Israelites (compare II 
		Chron. xx. and Ps. lxxxiii. 7). The attack of King Nahash upon the 
		frontier city Jabesh in Gilead was easily repulsed by Saul (I Sam. xi., 
		xiv. 47).
         
        
        Ammonite Warriors in David's Army.
         
        From II Sam. x. 2, it may be concluded that Nahash assisted 
		David out of hatred for Saul; but his son Hanun provoked David by 
		ill-treating his ambassadors, and brought about the defeat of the 
		Ammonites, despite assistance from their northern neighbor (ibid. 
        x. 13). Their capital Rabbah was captured (ibid. xii. 29), and 
		numerous captives were taken from "all the cities of the children of 
		Ammon." David's treatment of the captives (ibid. xii. 31) was not 
		necessarily barbarous; the description may be interpreted to mean that 
		he employed them as laborers in various public works. The Chronicler, 
		however, takes it in the most cruel sense (I Chron. xx. 3). Yet David 
		could not have exceeded the savagery customary in ancient Oriental 
		warfare; the Ammonites, themselves, for instance, were exceedingly cruel 
		(I Sam. xi. 2; Amos, i. 13). The new king, Shobi, a brother of Hanun, 
		evidently appointed by David, kept peace, his attitude being even 
		friendly (II Sam. xvii. 27). There were Ammonite warriors in David's 
		army (ibid. 23, 27) and Solomon's chief wife, the mother of his 
		heir, was Naamah, the Ammonitess (I Kings, xiv. 21; compare xi. 1), 
		probably a daughter of Shobi. After this, hostilities again broke out, 
		under Jehoshaphat (II Chron. xx.), under Jeroboam II. (Amos, i. 13) and 
		under Jotham, who subjected the Ammonites (II Chron. xxvii. 5).
         
        According to the Assyrian inscriptions under Baasha (Hebrew, 
		Ba'sha), the son of Rukhubi (Rehob), they had to send auxiliaries to the 
		powerful king Birhidri (Benhadad) of Damascus to aid him in his war 
		against Shalmaneser II. The following kings paid tribute to the 
		Assyrians: Sanipu (or "Sanibu" of Bit-Ammanu; "bit," house, has either 
		the sense of "reign" or "kingdom," or is added after the analogy of 
		"Bit-kḦumri"—house of Omri—for Israel, etc.) to Tiglath-pileser III.; 
		Puduilu to Sennacherib and Assarhaddon; Ammi-nadbi to Assurbanipal. An 
		Assyrian tribute-list, showing that Ammon paid one-fifth of Judah's 
		tribute, gives evidence of the scanty extent and resources of the 
		country (see Schrader, "K.A.T." pp. 141 et seq.; Delitzsch, 
		"Paradies," p. 294; Winckler, "Geschichte Israels," p. 215).  
        In the time of Nebuchadnezzar, the Ammonites seem to have been 
		fickle in their political attitude. They assisted the Babylonian army 
		against the Jews (II Kings, xxiv. 2); encroached upon the territory of 
		Gad; and occupied Heshbon and Jazer (Jer. xlix. 1; I Macc. v. 6-8; 
		compare Zeph. ii. 8); but the prophetic threatenings in Jer. ix. 26, 
		xxv. 21, xxvii. 3, and Ezra, xxi. 20, point to rebellion by them against 
		Babylonian supremacy. They received Jews fleeing before the Babylonians 
		(Jer. xl. 11), and their king, Baalis, instigated the murder of 
		Gedaliah, the first Babylonian governor (ibid. xl. 14, xli. 15). 
		At the time of the rebuilding of Jerusalem, they were hostile to the 
		Jews, and Tobiah, an Ammonite, incited them to hinder the work (Neh. 
		iii. 35). But inter-marriages between Jews and Ammonites were frequent 
		(Ezra, ix. 1; I Esd. viii. 69, and elsewhere). It is stated (I Macc. v. 
		6) that the Ammonites under Timotheus were defeated by Judas; but it is 
		probable that, after the exile, the term Ammonite denoted all Arabs 
		living in the former country of Ammon and Gad. Ezek. xxv. 4-5 seems to 
		mark the beginning of an Arab immigration, which is testified to by Neh. 
		ii. 19, iv. 7, and is described by Josephus as completed ("Ant." xiii. 
		9, § 1).
         
        
        Milcom Their Chief Deity.
         
        Of the customs, religion, and constitution of the Ammonites, 
		little is known. The frequent assumption that, living on the borders of 
		the desert, they remained more pastoral than the Moabites and 
		Israelites, is unfounded (Ezek. xxv. 4, II Chron. xxvii. 5); the 
		environs of
        Rabba (later
        Philadelphia), at least, were fertile and were tilled. In 
		regard to other cities than Rabba, see Judges, xi. 33; II Sam. xii. 31. 
		Of their gods the name of only the chief deity, Milcom—evidently a form 
		of Moloch—is known (I Kings, xi. 5 [LXX. 7], 33; I Kings, xi. 7; II 
		Kings, xxiii. 13). In Jer. xlix. 1, 3, "Malcam" is to be translated by 
		"Milcom" (the god) and not as in A. V., "their king."
        
        
        W.
        M.
        M.
         
        
        Ammonites and Jews Intermarry.
 —In Rabbinical Literature:
 
        The Ammonites, still numerous in the south of Palestine in the 
		second Christian century according to Justin Martyr ("Dialogus cum 
		Tryphone," ch. cxix.), presented a serious problem to the Pharisaic 
		scribes because of the fact that many marriages with Ammonite and 
		Moabite wives had taken place in the days of Nehemiah (Neh. xiii. 23). 
		Still later, it is not improbable that when Judas Maccabeus had 
		inflicted a crushing defeat upon the Ammonites, Jewish warriors took 
		Ammonite women as wives, and their sons, sword in hand, claimed 
		recognition as Jews notwithstanding the law (Deut. xxiii. 4) that "an 
		Ammonite or a Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the 
		Lord." Such a condition or a similar incident is reflected in the story 
		told in the Talmud (Yeb. 76b, 77a; Ruth R. to ii. 5) that 
		in the days of King Saulthe 
		legitimacy of David's claim to royalty was disputed on account of his 
		descent from Ruth, the Moabite; whereupon Ithra, the Israelite (II Sam. 
		xvii. 25; compare I Chron. ii. 17), girt with his sword, strode like an 
		Ishmaelite into the schoolhouse of Jesse, declaring upon the authority 
		of Samuel, the prophet, and his bet din (court of justice), that the law 
		excluding the Ammonite and Moabite from the Jewish congregation referred 
		only to the men—who alone had sinned in not meeting Israel with bread 
		and water—and not to the women. The story reflects actual conditions in 
		pre-Talmudic times, conditions that led to the fixed rule stated in the 
		Mishnah (Yeb. viii. 3): "Ammonite and Moabite men are excluded from the 
		Jewish community for all time; their women are admissible."
         
        The fact that Rehoboam, the son of King Solomon, was born of 
		an Ammonite woman (I Kings, xiv. 21-31) also made it difficult to 
		maintain the Messianic claims of the house of David; but it was adduced 
		as an illustration of divine Providence which selected the "two doves," 
		Ruth, the Moabite, and Naamah, the Ammonitess, for honorable distinction 
		(B. Ḳ. 38b).
        
        
        K.   |