| I. |
TITLE OF THE
BOOK: |
| |
A. |
In Hebrew the
book is titled hydbu
meaning “servant of Yahweh.” This may have been a popular name as
with Ahab’s steward who met Elijah (cf. 1 Ki 18) |
| |
B. |
In Greek the
book is titled OBDIOU, a transliteration of the Hebrew name and
title |
| II. |
AUTHOR:
Nothing is known historically about the author from the book or
from other background materials |
| III. |
DATE:
Probably exilic with the fall of Jerusalem (586/85 B.C.) |
| |
A. |
Preexilic
Date During the Reign of Jehoram (848-841 B.C.) |
| |
|
1. |
This is a
plausible option |
| |
|
2. |
It is argued
that verses 10-14 of Obadiah refer to the Philistine-Arab invasion
of Judah (cf. 2 Chron 21:8-20)While it is true that an Edomite
revolt did occur during this time period (cf. 2 Ki 8:20-22; 2
Chron 21:8-10), there is no mention of the Edomites invading with
the Philistines and the Arabs at this time (cf. 2 Chron 21:16ff).
This is a deduction that is made. While it is true that the palace
was looted (2 Chron 21;17), the magnitude does not seem to be
equivalent to that which was described in Obadiah vv. 10-14 |
| |
|
3. |
Jeremiah
borrowed from Obadiah.
This argument is inconclusive since it can be argued either way
depending on when one dates the book. |
| |
B. |
Preexilic
Date During the Reign of Ahaz (743-728 B.C.) |
| |
|
1. |
This view is
also a valid possibility |
| |
|
2. |
The argument
is that Obadiah is describing the defeat of Ahaz at the hands of
the Edomites and Philistines as was recorded in 2 Chronicles
28:17-18The problem with this position is that “no such capture
and despoliation of Jerusalem is reported to have taken place
during these campaigns as is implied in Obadiah 11” |
| |
C. |
Exilic Date
Soon after the Destruction of Jerusalem (586/85 B.C.) |
| |
|
1. |
The
Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem in 586 B.C. may best explain
the description found in Obadiah vv. 10-14 |
| |
|
|
a. |
Standing by
while strangers carried off Judah’s riches |
| |
|
|
b. |
The
disastrous nature of the fall |
| |
|
|
c. |
References to
lots being cast over the city |
| |
|
2. |
The
Babylonian context matches other exilic scriptures which describe
the involvement of Edom in the fall of Jerusalem: |
| |
|
|
a. |
Psalm 137:7:
“Remember, O Lord, against the sons of Edom the day of Jerusalem
who said, ‘Raze it, raze it, to its very foundation’“ |
| |
|
|
b. |
Lamentations
4:21-22 “Rejoice and be glad, O daughter of Edom, Who dwells in
the land of Uz; but the cup will come around to you as well, you
will become drunk, and make yourself naked, the punishment of your
iniquity has been completed. O daughter of Zion. He will exile you
no longer. But He will punish your iniquity, O daughter of Edom;
He will expose your sins.” |
| |
|
|
c. |
Ezekiel
25:12-14:” Thus says the Lord God, ‘Because Edom has acted against
the house of Judah by taking vengeance, and has incurred grievous
guilt, and avenged themselves upon them,’ Therefore thus says the
Lord God, ‘I will also stretch out My hand against Edom and cut
off man and beast from it. And I will lay it waste; from Teman
even to Dedan they will fall by the sword. An I will lay My
vengeance on Edom by the hand of the people Israel. Therefore,
they will act in Edom according to My anger and according to My
wrath’ thus they will know My vengeance,’ declares the Lord God”
(cf. also Ezekiel 35:5, 12-15) |
| |
|
3. |
The parallels
between Jeremiah and Obadiah are probably due to the priority of
Jeremiah or a common source |
| |
D. |
Conclusion:
Although it is very difficult to be certain about the date for
this book-especially between views one and three, it seems best to
this writer to identify Obadiah with view four, and the fall of
Jerusalem (586/85 B.C.) |
| IV. |
HISTORICAL
SETTING: |
| |
A. |
Josiah
brought about the final spiritual revival for Judah when he came
to the throne in 622 B.C. |
| |
B. |
The Assyrian
Empire Fell |
| |
|
1. |
The Assyrian
power rose with Ashurnasirpal II (884-859 B.C.) and Shalmaneser II
(859-824 B.C.) |
| |
|
2. |
Tiglath-pileser III (Pul in the Scriptures) began a group of
conquerors who took Syria and Palestine including Shalmaneser V
(727-722 B.C. who began the deportation of Samaria), Sargon II
(722-705 B.C. who completed the deportation of Samaria),
Sennacherib (704-581 B.C. who attacked king of Judah, Hezekiah
[Josiah’s father]), and Esarhaddon (681-669 B.C. who led campaigns
against Egypt) |
| |
|
3. |
Esarhaddon’s
son, Ashurbanipal (669-631) ruled much of the upper Egyptian city
of Thebes, but his decline and that of Assyria’s soon followed |
| |
|
4. |
Nineveh, the
capital, was destroyed in 612 B.C. |
| |
|
5. |
Assyria’s
army was defeated in 609 B.C. at Haran |
| |
|
6. |
What was left
of Assyria’s army went to Carchemish (just west of the Euphrates
River and north of Aram) |
| |
C. |
The
Neo-Babylonian Empire Arose |
| |
|
1. |
Merodach
Baladan was a Chaldean and father of Nabopolassar and grandfather
of Nebuchadnezzar. Merodach Baladan sent ambassadors to Hezekiah (Isa
39; 2 Ki 20:12-19) |
| |
|
2. |
In October
626 B.C. Nabopolassar defeated the Assyrians outside of Babylon |
| |
|
3. |
In 616 B.C.
Nabopolassar expanded his kingdom, and in 612 B.C. he joined with
the Medes and destroyed Nineveh |
| |
D. |
A Realignment
of Power in 609 B.C. and later |
| |
|
1. |
Judah: When
Assyria fell and Babylon arose Judah, under Josiah, removed itself
from Assyria’s control and existed as an autonomous state until
609 B.C. when it lost a battle with Egypt on the plain of Megiddo |
| |
|
2. |
Egypt: |
| |
|
|
a. |
Attempted to
expand its presence into Palestine with Assyria’s troubles |
| |
|
|
b. |
Egypt joined
with Assyria to fight the Babylonians at Haran |
| |
|
|
|
1) |
Judah tried
to stop Egypt’s (Pharaoh Neco II) alliance but was defeated on the
plain of Megiddo with the loss of their king, Josiah (cf. 2 Chron
35:20-24) |
| |
|
|
|
2) |
The Assyrians
lost their battle with Babylon (even with the help of Egypt) and
disappeared as a power in the world, and Egypt retreated to
Carchemish as the dividing line between Egypt and Babylonian |
| |
|
|
|
3) |
Egypt ruled
Judah: |
| |
|
|
|
|
a) |
Egypt (Necho) replaced
Josiah’s son, Jehoahaz, after three months with Jehoiakim (who was
another son of Josiah) as a vassal king (2 Ki 23:34-35) |
| |
|
|
|
|
b) |
Egypt (Necho) plundered
Judah’s treasuries |
| |
|
|
|
|
c) |
Egypt (Necho) took
Jehoahaz into captivity in Egypt |
| |
E. |
In 605 B.C.
other changes of power occurred: |
| |
|
1. |
Nebuchadnezzar defeated the Egyptians at Carchemish |
| |
|
2. |
Judah’s king,
Jehoiakim, changed his loyalty to the Babylonians rather than the
Egyptians and became Nebuchadnezzar’s vassal king (2 Ki. 24:1) |
| |
|
3. |
Nebuchadnezzar had to return to Babylon with the death of his
father, Nebopolassar |
| |
|
4. |
Nebuchadnezzar solidified his rule by appointing vassal kings and
taking hostages; Daniel was taken as a part of this deportation
(Dan 1:1-6) |
| |
F. |
In 601 Egypt
defeated the Babylonians |
| |
|
1. |
Judah’s king,
Jehoiakim, switched loyalty from Babylonia to the Egyptians (2 Ki
24:1) |
| |
|
2. |
On December
of 598 Babylonia made an attack on Jerusalem leading to
Jehoiakim’s death and the surrender of the city by his successor,
Jehoiachin, in March of 597 |
| |
|
3. |
Nebuchadnezzar, replaced Jehoiachin after only three months of
reign, deported him and 10,000 other leaders
from the city, looted the city, and placed Zedekiah Judah’s vassal
king (cf. 2 Ki 24:12-16) |
| |
G. |
Zedekiah was
a weak king who repeated the errors of those before him; he was
convinced by Egypt to revolt with a coalition of other states (Tyre
and Ammon) against Babylon (588 B.C. against the advise of
Jeremiah) and Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem in 586 B.C. |
| |
H. |
The Edomites
joined in Babylon’s destruction of Judah (Psalm 137:7; Lam
4:21-22; Ezek 25:12-14; 35:5, 12-15). |
| V. |
PURPOSES: |
| |
A. |
To proclaim
judgment upon Edom for rejoicing over the fall of Jerusalem |
| |
B. |
To proclaim
through the judgment of Edom that all of the nations will be
judged for their hostility to God’s people |
| |
C. |
To proclaim a
message of hope for Judah |