| I. |
TITLE OF THE BOOK: |
| |
A. |
In Hebrew: In Hebrew the
book is titled laqzhy
meaning “God strengthens” |
| |
B. |
In Greek: In Greek the
book is titled IESEKIHL;
the Hebrew is simply transliterated. |
| II. |
DATE: 593/2 to 562 B.C. |
| |
A. |
Ezekiel’s prophecies seem
to be dated around the exile of king Jehoiachin (597 B.C.)Thirteen
of Ezekiel’s message are dated precisely to the day, month and
year of King Jehoiachin’s exile to Babylon. The following chart
lays out the general chronological arrangement of these prophecies
with three exceptions (29:1, 17; 32:1) all of which were oracles
against Egypt and thus placed together with the other Egyptian
prophecies: |
|
Chariot Vision |
1:1-3 |
June 593 B.C. |
|
Call to be a Watchman |
3:16 |
June 593 |
|
Temple Vision |
8:1 |
August/September 592 |
|
Discourse with Elders |
20:1 |
August 591 |
|
Second Siege of Jerusalem |
24:1 |
January 588 |
|
Judgment on Tyre |
26:1 |
March/April 587/586 |
|
Judgment on Egypt |
29:1 |
January 587 |
|
Judgment on Egypt |
29:17 |
April 571 |
|
Judgment on Egypt |
30:20 |
April 587 |
|
Judgment on Egypt |
31:1 |
June 587 |
|
Lament over Pharaoh |
32:1 |
March 585 |
|
Lament over Egypt |
32:17 |
April 586 |
|
Fall of Jerusalem |
33:21 |
December/January 586/85 |
|
New Temple Vision |
40:1 |
April 573 |
|
| |
B. |
Ezekiel was called to his
prophetic ministry in the fifth year of the exile of King
Jehoiachin--593/92 B.C. |
| |
C. |
Ezekiel’s last discourse
was dated in the twenty- seventh year of Jehoiachin’s
exile--571/70 B.C. (29:17) |
| |
D. |
Ezekiel never mentions
the release of Jehoiachin in 560 B.C. |
| |
E. |
Therefore, it reasonable
to conclude that Ezekiel’s messages cover the period from 593/92
to 571/70 B.C. and were written down in present form from 571/70
B.C. to 562 B.C. |
| III. |
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND |
| |
A. |
Josiah brought about the
final spiritual revival for Judah when he came to the throne in
622 B.C. |
| |
B. |
The Assyrian Empire Fell |
| |
|
1. |
The Assyrian power rose
with Ashurnasirpal II (884- 859 B.C.) and Shalmaneser II (859-824
B.C.) |
| |
|
2. |
Tiglath-pileser III (Pul
in the Scriptures) began a group of conquerors who took Syria and
Palestine including Shalmaneser V (727-722 B.C. who began the
deportation of Samaria), Sargon II (722-705 B.C. who completed the
deportation of Samaria), Sennacherib (704-581 B.C. who attacked
king of Judah, Hezekiah [Josiah’s father]), and Esarhaddon
(681-669 B.C. who led campaigns against Egypt) |
| |
|
3. |
Esarhaddon’s son,
Ashurbanipal (669-631) ruled much of the upper Egyptian city of
Thebes, but his decline and that of Assyria’s soon followed |
| |
|
4. |
Nineveh, the capital, was
destroyed in 612 B.C. |
| |
|
5. |
Assyria’s army was
defeated in 609 B.C. at Haran |
| |
|
6. |
What was left of
Assyria’s army went to Carchemish (just west of the Euphrates
River and north of Aram) |
| |
C. |
The Neo-Babylonian Empire
Arose |
| |
|
1. |
Merodach Baladan was a
Chaldean and father of Nabopolassar and grandfather of
Nebuchadnezzar. Merodach Baladan sent ambassadors to Hezekiah (Isa
39; 2 Ki 20:12-19) |
| |
|
2. |
In October 626 B.C.
Nabopolassar defeated the Assyrians outside of Babylon |
| |
|
3. |
In 616 B.C. Nabopolassar
expanded his kingdom, and in 612 B.C. he joined with the Medes and
destroyed Nineveh |
| |
D. |
A Realignment of Power in
609 B.C. and later |
| |
|
1. |
Judah: When Assyria fell
and Babylon arose Judah, under Josiah, removed itself from
Assyria’s control and existed as an autonomous state until 609
B.C. when it lost a battle with Egypt on the plain of Megiddo |
| |
|
2. |
Egypt: |
| |
|
|
a. |
Attempted to expand its
presence into Palestine with Assyria’s troubles |
| |
|
|
b. |
Egypt joined with Assyria
to fight the Babylonians at Haran |
| |
|
|
|
1) |
Judah tried to stop
Egypt’s (Pharaoh Neco II) alliance but was defeated on the plain
of Megiddo with the loss of their king, Josiah (cf. 2 Chron 35:20-
24) |
| |
|
|
|
2) |
The Assyrians lost their
battle with Babylon (even with the help of Egypt) and disappeared
as a power in the world, and Egypt retreated to Carchemish as the
dividing line between Egypt and Babylonian |
| |
|
|
|
3) |
Egypt ruled Judah: |
| |
|
|
|
|
a) |
Egypt (Necho) replaced Josiah’s son,
Jehoahaz, after three months with Jehoiakim (who was another son
of Josiah) as a vassal king (2 Ki 23:34-35) |
| |
|
|
|
|
b) |
Egypt (Necho) plundered Judah’s
treasuries |
| |
|
|
|
|
c) |
Egypt (Necho) took Jehoahaz into
captivity in Egypt |
| |
E. |
In 605 B.C. other changes
of power occurred: |
| |
|
1. |
Nebuchadnezzar defeated
the Egyptians at Carchemish |
| |
|
2. |
Judah’s king, Jehoiakim,
changed his loyalty to the Babylonians rather than the Egyptians
and became Nebuchadnezzar’s vassal king (2 Ki. 24:1) |
| |
|
3. |
Nebuchadnezzar had to
return to Babylon with the death of his father, Nebopolassar |
| |
|
4. |
Nebuchadnezzar solidified
his rule by appointing vassal kings and taking hostages; Daniel
was taken as a part of this deportation (Dan 1:1-6) |
| |
F. |
In 601 Egypt defeated the
Babylonians |
| |
|
1. |
Judah’s king, Jehoiakim,
switched loyalty from Babylonia to the Egyptians (2 Ki 24:1) |
| |
|
2. |
On December of 598
Babylonia made an attack on Jerusalem leading to Jehoiakim’s death
and the surrender of the city by his successor, Jehoiachin, in
March of 597 |
| |
|
3. |
Nebuchadnezzar, replaced
Jehoiachin after only three months of reign, deported him and
10,000 other leaders from the city, looted the city, and placed
Zedekiah Judah’s vassal king (cf. 2 Ki 24:12-16) |
| |
G. |
Ezekiel was one of those
deported during this second deportation (597 B.C.). He would begin
his prophetic ministry five years later (Ezk 1:2; 8:1 etc.) |
| |
|
1. |
He lived in Tel Aviv
beside the Kebar River (Grand Canal) in Babylon 3:15 |
| |
|
2. |
Dyer writes, “During
these final years Ezekiel was ministering in Babylon, predicting
the coming collapse of Jerusalem. His message fell on deaf ears
till word of the city’s destruction was received in Babylon. The
fall of the city prompted a change in Ezekiel’s prophetic message.
Before Jerusalem fell, Ezekiel’s message focused on Judah’s
forthcoming destruction because of her sin. After Jerusalem’s
fall, Ezekiel’s message centered on Judah’s future restoration.” |
| IV. |
AUTHOR: The Prophet
Ezekiel, a priest and son of Buzi (1:3) |
| |
A. |
External Evidence: |
| |
|
1. |
Ezekiel was considered to
be the author of this book until the Twentieth Century when in
1924 Gustav Hoelscher first questioned authorship based upon
questionable internal evidence |
| |
|
2. |
Therefore, external
evidence is almost unanimously in favor of the prophet Ezekiel as
the book’s author |
| |
B. |
Internal Evidence |
| |
|
1. |
The autobiographical
style of the book supports Ezekiel as the author of the book (“I,”
“me,” “my” are in almost every chapter of the book; cf. chapter
2:1-10) |
| |
|
2. |
The book has a uniformity
of language, style, theme, and message which support the theory of
a single author |
| |
|
3. |
Hill and Walton write,
“The lack of strict chronological ordering of the literature may
argue in favor of Ezekiel as the compiler of the oracles, since it
is very likely another editor would have been more concerned with
the deliberate sequencing of the dated materials” |
| V. |
CANONICAL PLACEMENT |
| |
A. |
In the Hebrew canon
Ezekiel is placed following Isaiah and Jeremiah among the Major
Prophets |
| |
B. |
In the Greek canon, which
the English arrangement follows, Ezekiel is placed after
Lamentations which was associated with the Prophet Jeremiah |
| |
C. |
Hill and Walton write,
“While Ezekiel was always included in the Hebrew canon, later
Jewish scholars disputed the book’s canonical value. At issue were
seeming discrepancies between the prophet’s understanding of
temple ritual and the prescriptions of Mosaic law (e.g., a
disagreement in the number and kinds of animals sacrificed at the
New Moon festival-- cf. Num. 28:11 and Ezek. 46:6). The rabbis
eventually restricted the public and private use of Ezekiel,
commenting that the ultimate harmonization of the difficulties
must await ‘the coming of Elijah’ (cf. Mal 4:5).” |
| VI. |
LITERARY STYLE |
| |
A. |
There are many different
“Speech Types” which Ezekiel employs to communicate his message.
The following chart lists some of them out |
|
Judgment oracle |
Usually introduced by formula, “I am
against you” |
21:1-5 |
|
Aftermath or restoration oracle |
Reversing judgment formula, “I am for you” |
34:11-15 |
|
Command formula |
Especially “Son of man, set your face ... |
6:2-3; 20:46-47 |
|
“Woe” oracle of indictment |
|
13:3-7; 34:2-6 |
|
Demonstration oracle |
Usually containing “because ... therefore”
clauses |
13:8-9; 16:36- 42 |
|
Disputation oracle |
IN which popular proverb is recited and
then refuted by prophetic discourse (e.g., “sour grapes”
proverb) |
18:1-20; cf.
12:22-25 |
|
Lament |
|
|
|
Over Tyre |
|
26:15-18 |
|
Over Pharaoh |
|
32:1-16 |
|
Wailing lament |
Introduced by “wail” |
30:1-4
32:17-21 |
|
Riddles, parables, allegories |
E.g., parable of the vine Allegories of
the eagle and cedars, lion, boiling pot etc. |
15, Chaps. 17, 19, 23, 24, 27 |
|
| |
B. |
The book has a basic
chronological arrangement (unlike Jeremiah) |
| |
C. |
The major units of the
book follow the chronological flow of Ezekiel’s life and naturally
relate to the message of the book: |
| |
|
1. |
Chapters 1--24 speak of
judgment since the fall of Jerusalem is coming |
| |
|
2. |
Chapters 25--32 emphasize
judgment upon the nations after the fall of Jerusalem for either
being “participants in or gleeful onlookers to ‘the day of Jacob’s
trouble’“ |
| |
|
3. |
Chapters 33-48 speak of
the hope of restoration for the people held in captivity after the
fall of Jerusalem. |
| VII. |
PURPOSES FOR THE BOOK |
| |
A. |
To speak “locally to the
exiles whom Jeremiah addresses by letter (e.g., Jer. 29), as
people who continue to listen to false prophets and practice
idolatry. The contents of Ezekiel indicate that little has changed
in the attitude of the Jewish people who have come to Babylon” |
| |
B. |
To outline the blessing
that follows necessary judgment |
| |
C. |
To emphasize God’s
sovereignty which will bring about judgment and restoration |
| |
D. |
To warn Israel as a
“watchman” of imminent judgment |
| |
E. |
To stress the need for
individual responsibility and national accountably before God |
| |